mzprox: So I wonder.. Now I'm on my second playthrough, forcing myself to side with Iorveth-and while I would support Saskia over Henselt easily I can't stand the Scoia'tael..
They are terrorist without any realistic goal except maybe revenge.. whatever they do it will not help them nor their race at all.
In an analogy I think they are like the native north-americans-and while I can sympathise with them-not with their methods- I just can't see how could a human fight on their side?
I mean they keep trying to kill me just because i'm human.. they are the most racist group in the whole universe..
Roche unti isn1t too moral, but they are not racists-they fight for temeria, angainst the elven bandits defending their own people.
So yes it is a bad thing that the non-humans treated like second class, but why would a human help them in their futile war agains innocent /and not so innocent humans?
Hey mzprox, I kinda know what you mean. I mean, the first time I meet Scoia'tael they would have killed me with arrows were it not for Triss. The Scoia'tael acted like terrorist, heck, even Cedric the ex-Scoia'tael disapproves of them. They claim to fight for freedom and against persecution, yet they are doing it by brute force.
That being said, things took for a better turn when Iorveth meets Geralt though. He realized that hatred has blinded him until he gets used by the kingslayers and even got some of his men eliminated. He decided to join the fight in Aedirn where for the first time in a long time men, dwarves, and elves are fighting hand-in-hand. It gave hope that maybe all can coexist in the paradise called Vergen.
Compared to Roche's path, Iorveth's path seems less of a lost cause (given that Temeria gets divided between the 2 other Kings). Eh, too bad Saskia got charmed under the Lesbomancy curse, so I admit there is this one great uncertainty.