Yakkuz: Let's not hide behind words, LiefLayer believe he|she is entitled to a gift key BECAUSE he|she is basing on the previous cases, since there is no new comunication stating things are changed.
If you've always drunk sugar-free coffee since i know you and you don't clearly tell me you want your next cofee with sugar, i'll bring you a sugar-free one and my assumptions will be legit.
That's the point.
GOG could sell any product the way they want, but they NEED to inform the customers that the previous policy changed, otherwise is bad advertising.
And if people ask a refund due to this, it would be fair to give them a full refund, since it's a communication mistake that needs to be acknowledged and fixed with a CLEAR notice on the store page.
False advertising is valid grounds for demanding a refund. Expecting one thing and getting something else is not. By the letter of the advertising what happened is valid. As such, I see no grounds for a refund baised on getting something other than what you paid for.
What was that game? The one that was advertised as a "space flight sim" but what got delivered was a "walking sim with minimal space flight?" That was a case of false advertising. Which is illegeal.
Deceptive advertising is legeal. I do not recall anything being said about being given an EXTRA copy of the orgional if I purchased the EE. Just that if I
did not posess the orgional game I would get a free copy. So I see no form of deceptive advertising occuring here.
I got what I expected, based on the discription given. Why were you expecting something else?
Edit/Update: I am basing my stance on what was advertised before the game launched, as well as what was there when I found out theat they were delivering the actual PS:T rather than "PS:T with some gameplay changes thrown in"