Posted June 04, 2015
darkredshift: No, a port of the original with better controls, the ability to use modern graphics or either of the two previous versions, all censorship from the other two completely removed, and the sequel finally released. it would need to be Rare themselves that do it, not Microsoft because after L&R, Microsoft can't be trusted.
Besides, Microsoft made computers and Windows OSs, not just the Xbox etc. so they shouldn't have any problems in letting Rare have free reign with the port instead of making shitty Kinect or Banjo Kazooie games.
a better question is does microsoft WANT to ? Besides, Microsoft made computers and Windows OSs, not just the Xbox etc. so they shouldn't have any problems in letting Rare have free reign with the port instead of making shitty Kinect or Banjo Kazooie games.
ms doesnt really care much about pc gaming despite what they say if there ever is going to be a conker remake it will be an xbox exclusive
because that would drive sales of the xbox one and that is what ms wants to establish their platform further
and rare isnt rare anymore
the rare we know died in 2003
most of the people involved with rare's heydays ( ie the n64 output ) have long since left the company
rare these days is a paltry shadow of its former self
and rare is wholly owned by microsoft
rare does what microsoft wants the distinction these days is minimal
rare is not a near mythical faultless oppressed developer which you seem to think it is
its a studio wholly owned by microsoft and as such it produces what microsoft wants them to produce
that is how these things work