Dalthnock: By "not being relevant", you mean it faded from the collective consciousness and went back to what it always was, a timeless tale constantly being discovered by new generations of readers.
Too bad Amazon couldn't let it be, and had to "add to the lore".
We all know how that goes. Every single time.
Mafwek: Hardly timeless, considering as a story it isn't even that good. That's not to say that I don't respect Tolkien or LoTR's influence and world building. However I would agree that it's a
classic story.
You don't like it, that's fine. We can't all like the same things. Completely understandable.
I view it as a passing of the torch, as it were, between generations. It's quite possible taht this wasn't Tolkien's intention, it's just how I personally view it.
Gandalf, Elrond, and many of the older people could end Sauron's threat very easily, since they did destroy the much more dangerous Morgoth all those years ago.
But if they are to leave Middle-Earth, they have to know if these new kids, Aragorn included, are at least capable of tackling on an emerging threat. Which they barely did. Younger generations grow ever more weak. Quite poignant.
Again, this may not have been Tolkien's intention, but it does fit.
Mafwek: It's not that Lord of the Rings faded from collective consciousness, you still have it's memes, it's more accurate to say that it ain't "trendy" anymore.
I fervently wish it would stay that way. Everything that is trendy and mainstream ends up corrupted.