Posted July 10, 2015

thesmashingone
Baaaa... Meeh...
Registered: Apr 2012
From United States

JudasIscariot
Thievin' Bastard
GOG.com Team
Registered: Oct 2008
From Poland

coldy_robsten
New User
Registered: Dec 2011
From Germany

PaterAlf
Cookie Monster
Registered: Apr 2012
From Christmas Island
Posted July 13, 2015
high rated
A Linux version for Volgarr the Viking was added.
http://www.gog.com/forum/volgarr_the_viking/changelog
http://www.gog.com/forum/volgarr_the_viking/changelog

shmerl
🐧
Registered: Sep 2011
From United States
Posted July 13, 2015

http://www.gog.com/forum/volgarr_the_viking/changelog

Ganni1987
'My Rewards' is DRM
Registered: Sep 2011
From Malta
Posted July 13, 2015
high rated
Legend of Grimrock for Linux has been updated:
Update (13.07.2015):
We have updated the Linux version of Legend of Grimrock that works with Nvidia 900 series video cards.
Tested & Works on 960 :-)
Update (13.07.2015):
We have updated the Linux version of Legend of Grimrock that works with Nvidia 900 series video cards.
Tested & Works on 960 :-)

BillyMaysFan59
gone (but still playing his games)
Registered: Nov 2013
From United States
Posted July 13, 2015

http://www.gog.com/forum/volgarr_the_viking/changelog

0Grapher
[ʔoʊɡɹæfə]
Registered: Jun 2014
From Germany
Posted July 13, 2015

Post edited July 13, 2015 by 0Grapher

chevkoch
onward
Registered: Aug 2013
From Clipperton Island
Posted July 13, 2015

http://www.gog.com/forum/volgarr_the_viking/changelog

immi101
User
Registered: May 2010
From Germany

Ganni1987
'My Rewards' is DRM
Registered: Sep 2011
From Malta
Posted July 13, 2015

is it just my imagination or is there a trend recently to not provide a deb package anymore?
grimrock, ksp, to the moon, botanicula -> all just tar archives
I prefer tarballs myself as it gives me more control of the contents and it's much easier to pack than debs.

immi101
User
Registered: May 2010
From Germany
Posted July 13, 2015

is it just my imagination or is there a trend recently to not provide a deb package anymore?
grimrock, ksp, to the moon, botanicula -> all just tar archives

I prefer tarballs myself as it gives me more control of the contents and it's much easier to pack than debs.
the only reason i prefer those and not the tarballs is that the contents is compressed with xz instead of gzip which GOG is using for the tarballs.
extracting .debs is pretty straightforward, so I find just storing the .deb more convenient than repacking the tarball with xz.
Post edited July 13, 2015 by immi101

IronArcturus
RoguelikeWarrior
Registered: Dec 2011
From United States
Posted July 14, 2015

I prefer tarballs myself as it gives me more control of the contents and it's much easier to pack than debs.

the only reason i prefer those and not the tarballs is that the contents is compressed with xz instead of gzip which GOG is using for the tarballs.
extracting .debs is pretty straightforward, so I find just storing the .deb more convenient than repacking the tarball with xz.

Geralt_of_Rivia
🐺 Gwynnbleid 🐺
Registered: Apr 2009
From Austria
Posted July 14, 2015
@Judas: Any ETA on Terraria update 1.3.0.5?

ssokolow
Linux Geek
Registered: Feb 2011
From Canada
Posted July 14, 2015

the only reason i prefer those and not the tarballs is that the contents is compressed with xz instead of gzip which GOG is using for the tarballs.
extracting .debs is pretty straightforward, so I find just storing the .deb more convenient than repacking the tarball with xz.

(And you can uninstall it by running start.sh with the --uninstall option and then deleting the game folder)