I'll quickly jump in and say that there are valid reasons to vote gamerager, and I just don't see those reasons in SirP's wagon. I might be blinded by my previous town-clearing of him to where I am not seeing him from scum side, but I am willing to reread and rethink if necessary.
Of course, I'd be a bit embarassed if SPF is scum.
The only reason I see for GR's vote on SPF is "the wagon that isn't me" reasoning.

@ZFR iirc without looking, you stated you weren't willing to vote GR? If I am remembering correctly, please elaborate? If I got the name wrong but the facts correct, please speak up whoever you are!

Gotta IRL some more, so laters.

As you made up the term, please explain to us what you mean by "scum infernal?" I would appreciate your definition of the term.

The devil who play the role of an innocent sheep and laughing out hard each night during his/her kills. A sadist with no morals, a great pretender, a "scum from the hell".

Well I'm certainly not going to keep pressing you on it if it's a linguistic mixup as your English is far better than my (nonexistant) Russian. I'll keep it in mind though as we have had slips passed off as linguistic issues in the past (for those reading who might remember it, I'm thinking of Blotunga's Saphiros thing from Captain Sapphire - The Movie).

It's your right to press on and I'm okay with any pressure. Linguistic slips might happen that is why I specifically mentioned that I'm not willing to use it as excuse, in other words if you or others find it fishy, go for it.
And for what's it's worth I meant exactly what I wrote: I want it to be sounded that I'm worried. That is not a linguistic issue, it was intentional.

In that case, why are you concerned about how you sound? If you are worried then you don't need to worry about sounding worried because it should come naturally.

Because for some reason I respect your play style and you as a player. And you told me that I were sounded like it was ages ago since you was around last time. And I didn't want you to feel that way, like I'm accusing you or something, especially, after that heated debate with "paraphrasing" questions which I found to be a bit "rude".

Right ok, I think I see what you mean now.

*shrug* I'm reasonably satisfied it's not a slip.

Everything going on today ended up stretching later than I expected, so I wasn't able to catch up like I was planning to. I'll catch up tomorrow. I'm sorry peoples!

@everyone: who should the cop investigate tonight (if we have a cop?) please give ideas.

ZFR and/or SPF (role cop and/or alignment cop). I prefer SPF first: if he is a bad guy to mitigate the risk, if he is a good guy to clear his name.

I was willing to vote, but when it grew so fast to L-2 (where "fast" actually means fast), it felt like an opportunistic wagon where scum can vote someone for being a GamerRager.

Quick post.

Why is it less thought out? Dude said he wanted to sound worried, and like SPF said in a later post, if he was worried, it would come across naturally in his posts rather than by saying "look at me, I am worried!"

I don't remember the whole round brackets thing (and to be honest, I should be looking at AFP now that he's barely even contributing), but scum can slip from time to time and then try to cover it up either by backing from it, or doubling down. SPF also brought up a wonderful example, the Captain Sapphire game, where two mafiosos slipped and one of them got lynched. The other one who didn't get lynched was blotunga, who was able to explain that it was a linguistic mess-up. And I honestly don't have a lot of confidence in buying the "linguistic" reason again.

The cop should investigate whoever he sees fit, so that scum may not direct him into a less satisfactory player "out of demand," so to speak.

Scum is Scum. By definition,.what else can it be? Are you saying the twist is there is no scum?

Not saying, I said already that it might the case, yes. Also that I'd like to have even more *twisted* twist, I like twists.