Everything I say today gets twisted and misinterpreted. Obviously I was expecting this. I knew all night long that my accidental hammer would make me a very attractive mislynch target, so I figured I'd come out with strong opinions and carefully observe who'd be coming for me. But it's all been like a whisper campaign, and no clear mastermind behind it. Meanwhile my wagon analysis was completely ignored by everyone. Then AFP's observation on Cadaver made a lot of sense. I could so easily see that scenario play out; it really had the ring of truth to it. Yet I am seen as scummy for agreeing with him enough to place my vote??!

I explained to ZFR why I voted Carradice, something that was so important to him that he bolded it, and he just ignored that explanation, instead engaging me on the topic of him shading me, and then ignoring my followup on that, too - all the while keeping his vote on me until I got to L-1 - and then removed it (so it won't be there for the analysis when I flip town?)

zazak goes from "fierly protecting" me to voting me, and claims it was all a test, which is like newbie scum defense 101, but is bought without questioning by all of you.

trent's been lurking all game long, and is only "reluctantly" getting on my wagon, same as he was on Carradice, but doesn't respond to my questioning him about GR.

And then GR who claimed not to be voting for me with the purpose of giving me more time to defend myself, goes and vote me anyway without actually giving me time to defend myself... Ok, I did call him out for that, so maybe that's justified and not too scummy - but all the rest of those votes are scummy as hell, which they clearly can't all be. So who shaped the thinking of these voters?
I'm guessing AFP starting the wagon is probably town - but really don't like ZFR's voting behaviour, nor zazak's "test".

Since zazak doesn't seem to be going anywhere:

vote ZFR