lazydog: attracting posts by others.
Kleetus: Nobody is holding a gun to their head and forcing them to post, and it's not like they don't know what the thread is about.
It's simple, if you don't like a thread, don't click on it and don't post in it.
But don't do both, page after page, and in a lot of cases it's stuff completely unrelated and not involving the topic or OP, and then complain.
I'd wager that more than half the posts in this thread fit that category.
Regardless, it's his thread, if he wants to bump it up or post crap and he gets something from it, leave him alone.
Why is that so hard, to simply ignore a thread and not click on it?
I just don't get it.
Kleetus: I'm surprised you didn't say anything about my family, like you usually do to people.
Kleetus, please- there is no topic. There is simply an instruction in the topic subject field box to to promote the infowars site. rtcvb32 is advertising ideas that he will not defend.
There is no subject matter posted by rtcvb32 other than web link dumps.
There is no discussion by rtcvb32.
rtcvb32 wishes only to spam this forum regularly with his perception of what is "news", what he considers to be relevant to
you.
He is using the unmoderated nature of this forum to express his sociopolitical opinions, via clickbait weblinks, none of which involve him to substantiate factual accuracy in any way.
rtcvb32 is deliberately spamming this forum on a regular basis which will inevitably attract opponents posts on the "merits" of his logic and web link dumps.
This is a discussion board. If something is wrong or innaccurate or plain spam, it does not automatically mean that people should ignore it.
Now, do you agree with any of the above?