Defend against... what?

And why?

If I am posting nonfactual links/locations of content, then I'll act appropriately.

Let's see... How about something to defend... That Obama's birth certificate was deemed fake? That SB18 bill is a bad idea? That Zuckerberg met with leaders in China and are actively blocking anything they deem 'fake news' (which is actually differing opinion and real news they aren't/won't cover)? That the Russian 'hacks' never happened? That there's studies showing too much TV viewing is bad for you? That your gut, gut health and bacteria are important to your overall health?

You complain about the OP engaging in debate and all you can post is the state of your boredom?

And the definition of a forum is whatever the mods and owner want it to be, you or a dictionary don't get to define how they run it.

Just a suggestion, but if you want to promote discussion, maybe choose one of the articles that you find particularly interesting on any given day and feature it for debate. You provide a lot of links every day, some of them of lower quality than others bordering on mere speculation. Feature one of the better ones?

rtcvb32 start by posting your arguments/opinions in detail on every weblink you decide to post in this thread, please post substantiated web link proof in the same manner that you throw around your usual guff. I suspect you will tire quickly.
Kleetus, I complain about the OP not engaging in debate and I post the state of my boredom with you.

You could try reading some more, do it at the same time as you practice thinking- a few minutes every day will help.

While cutting back sounds nice, there is seriously sometimes just too much. Too much i want to quote, too much that seems very important for the immediate future.

I don't want to do this, i really don't. I'd rather go back and try to play a game every day or something and do more reviews and get to my massive backlog and maybe enjoy one of my other loves in life.

But this has a higher priority... at least for the immediate moment.

If we want to debate on specific articles/videos, sure, although ones more useful for debating and talk would be probably Stefan Molyneux, or Sargon of Akkad or something similar, who have similar topics generally with current events or other things.

You could try ignoring this thread if you dislike it so much.

You still can't and haven't answered why you won't do that?

I've asked numerous times and still no answer.

I have answered you but you fail to hear.

Ignoring an opinion just because you do not agree is a dangerous principle.

Hence: forum

I thought we all settled on Bipolar Disorder with Obsessive Thoughts and Behaviour.

Your higher priority is pissing people off, me included to the point of offense.

Feel free to debate on any specifics you want, just stop promoting infowars and stop inflicting your higher priority on others, you selfish bastard.

If getting this 'message' across to other people is as important to you as you say it is, wouldn't it be better to find a place to do it where people actually listen to you? I'm not sure where that place is, but surely even you must admit that you're not getting through to anybody here.

No you haven't, stating it's a "forum" or because "there's no topic" doesn't answer my question: who is forcing you to click on this thread?

I still don't get why ignoring someone or what they post is so difficult and why you are not ultimately in control?

Kleetus, is this or is this not a forum?

Kleetus, is a forum a place for debate?

Kleetus, should I feel excluded from debate because I disagree?

That's not what I'm suggesting or we were discussing, don't misrepresent me.

You want to prevent RT from posting and you want this thread deleted.

That's not debate, that's dictatorship.

Kleetus, if you don't mind I will not continue argument with you.

It wasn't an argument, but nonetheless I'll miss you.