It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
low rated
avatar
Rusty_Gunn: I think I can translate what DaCostaBR said

"Find a girl (or a guy -husbando-) that you literally (not figuratively) have no chance of having in real life for the simple reason that they are fictional. Claim the one you want. Then go where those that do have waifus/husbandos gather. Then procede to explain why yours is the correct one to have."

Hope that helps
avatar
Breja: No, it does not. How can knowing this stuff help? :D The only thing missing is someone asking me if I read Sutter Cane :D
Do you read Sutter Cane?
avatar
tinyE: How is this news? :P

Sorry to delude anyone here but news flash, Trump is a bigot, and if someone is planning on voting for him, odds are they're a bigot too. :D

And while eksasol makes a point about the source, these stories are popping up too often, and from too many reliable sources. Shit, the KKK has embraced his candidacy! :P David Duke was inspired to come out of retirement for this guy.
avatar
sasuke12: He is becoming popular with the female voters because of his 6 foot 3 inch tall height, charisma, good looks and wealth.

And he has been in bed with many women.

I won't be surprised if he wins.
Note: This only applies to straight women. Lesbians do not find him attractive because, of course, he's not a woman and lesbians aren't attracted to men by definition.

Furthermore, it does not apply to more liberal women. In particular, fair-minded feminists would not want to vote for him, especially given his stances on abortion, and that his opponent is a woman with a more female-friendly stance on that issue.

Furthermore, atheists and those in liberal religions are less likely to vote for him. Also, educated people are far less likely to vote for him; that certainly includes educated women.
avatar
Breja: Ok, I need to stop talking to you now. I'm not even sure if you're speaking english any more or summoning Cthulhu.
avatar
Rusty_Gunn: I think I can translate what DaCostaBR said

"Find a girl (or a guy -husbando-) that you literally (not figuratively) have no chance of having in real life for the simple reason that they are fictional. Claim the one you want. Then go where those that do have waifus/husbandos gather. Then procede to explain why yours is the correct one to have."

Hope that helps
Your waifu is trash.
Attachments:
trash.png (384 Kb)
Post edited September 24, 2016 by DaCostaBR
avatar
Darvond: ...And that somehow absolves him?
avatar
Garrison72: Actually, yes. You need proof he endorses such views. The whole guilt by association thing you know.
Aside from the monetary donations?
low rated
I still find it funny how the left-wing claims to be oh so intellectual and how they claim their "news" sources are oh so reliable yet they basically waged war against a cartoon internet frog. This goes along with the narrative that Hillary Clinton really has severe brain issues.
avatar
tinyE: How is this news? :P

Sorry to delude anyone here but news flash, Trump is a bigot, and if someone is planning on voting for him, odds are they're a bigot too. :D

And while eksasol makes a point about the source, these stories are popping up too often, and from too many reliable sources. Shit, the KKK has embraced his candidacy! :P David Duke was inspired to come out of retirement for this guy.
Considering the fact that Democrats had no issue with Hillary Clinton being buddies with Robert Byrd (former KKK who we are suppose to believe rejected racial supremacism before his death) or with Clinton receiving support from active KKK members, you are nothing more than a race-baiter. Duke is former KKK and has rejected racial supremacism. He gets shit thrown at him for not bowing down to the destruction of western civilization.

Also not only has Clinton received support from white racists but she has received support from other types of racists like the some of the black racists of the "Black Lives Matter" movement. She also auctioned off weapons deals to sexist Islamic regimes in the Middle East in exchange for contributions to her false charity.
Attachments:
cnnbias.jpg (55 Kb)
Just to repeat for the slow people: Now that I think about it, and I'm as guilty of this as anyone else, I'm sick of anyone preaching anything in here period, unless it pertains to games, sports, or DRM! :D

1) SS 2 is overrated crap
2) The Patriots are the team to beat
3) Blizzard can blow me
Post edited September 24, 2016 by tinyE
avatar
tinyE: Just to repeat for the slow people: Now that I think about it, and I'm as guilty of this as anyone else, I'm sick of anyone preaching anything in here period, unless it pertains to games, sports, or DRM! :D

1) SS 2 is overrated crap
2) The Patriots are the team to beat
3) Blizzard can blow me
I don't think SS2 is that overrated...sure, it's not the best game ever and I probably won't ever play it again (one playthrough is enough), and the endgame sucks, but it's a unique experience and everybody interested in pc gaming should at least have a look at it.
I've come to dislike Bliizard though as well...I really liked the original Starcraft, but SC2: Legacy of the void killed any interest I had in that setting.
avatar
tinyE: Just to repeat for the slow people: Now that I think about it, and I'm as guilty of this as anyone else, I'm sick of anyone preaching anything in here period, unless it pertains to games, sports, or DRM! :D

1) SS 2 is overrated crap
2) The Patriots are the team to beat
3) Blizzard can blow me
avatar
morolf: I don't think SS2 is that overrated...sure, it's not the best game ever and I probably won't ever play it again (one playthrough is enough), and the endgame sucks, but it's a unique experience and everybody interested in pc gaming should at least have a look at it.
I've come to dislike Bliizard though as well...I really liked the original Starcraft, but SC2: Legacy of the void killed any interest I had in that setting.
I LOVE StarCraft and I'd like to find out if I love SC 2 but their DRM is prohibiting me. :P That's why I took that swipe.

And yes, I overdid it with SS 2. It just seems so many people swear it is one of the best games ever which always freaks me out a little. :P
low rated
avatar
Garrison72: Actually, yes. You need proof he endorses such views. The whole guilt by association thing you know.
avatar
Darvond: Aside from the monetary donations?
To whom, from whom? Does he take money from the clan? You need proof for all of it to lead your little crusade.
avatar
DaCostaBR: Now that you do you are ready to direct yourself to your favorite "waifu bait", pick your own waifu, go to Reddit, 4chan, Tumblr or another hive of scum and villainy of your choice, and engage in "waifu wars".
avatar
Breja: Ok, I need to stop talking to you now. I'm not even sure if you're speaking english any more or summoning Cthulhu.
You are an intellectual coward. Seen enough posts of yours to conclude that much.
Post edited September 24, 2016 by Garrison72
avatar
morolf: I don't think SS2 is that overrated...sure, it's not the best game ever and I probably won't ever play it again (one playthrough is enough), and the endgame sucks, but it's a unique experience and everybody interested in pc gaming should at least have a look at it.
I've come to dislike Bliizard though as well...I really liked the original Starcraft, but SC2: Legacy of the void killed any interest I had in that setting.
avatar
tinyE: I LOVE StarCraft and I'd like to find out if I love SC 2 but their DRM is prohibiting me. :P That's why I took that swipe.

And yes, I overdid it with SS 2. It just seems so many people swear it is one of the best games ever which always freaks me out a little. :P
I don't think you missed out on that much with SC2...multiplayer is too much work, not really fun (at least for me), only campaign I really enjoyed was the Zerg one...and they pretty much butchered the story. By the end of Legacy of the void (which is really lame...I liked the Protoss in SC1, but here they come across as pompous bores) I didn't care about that universe anymore at all. Too much mystery nonsense and too much retconning...ultimately it was a disappointment.
avatar
Darvond: Aside from the monetary donations?
avatar
Garrison72: To whom, from whom? Does he take money from the clan? You need proof for all of it to lead your little crusade.
avatar
Breja: Ok, I need to stop talking to you now. I'm not even sure if you're speaking english any more or summoning Cthulhu.
avatar
Garrison72: You are an intellectual coward. Seen enough posts of yours to conclude that much.
I've never seen a GOG ban firsthand, but you're in a hurry to test the system, it seems. Here you go. Archived.

He is/was the third primary fund source for the PAC, NimbleAmerica. Here is an article from the Guardian, a more mainstream source.

But the reality is, you could have just googled this yourself, but were afraid to face the reality of things.
avatar
tinyE: I LOVE StarCraft and I'd like to find out if I love SC 2 but their DRM is prohibiting me. :P That's why I took that swipe.

And yes, I overdid it with SS 2. It just seems so many people swear it is one of the best games ever which always freaks me out a little. :P
avatar
morolf: I don't think you missed out on that much with SC2...multiplayer is too much work, not really fun (at least for me), only campaign I really enjoyed was the Zerg one...and they pretty much butchered the story. By the end of Legacy of the void (which is really lame...I liked the Protoss in SC1, but here they come across as pompous bores) I didn't care about that universe anymore at all. Too much mystery nonsense and too much retconning...ultimately it was a disappointment.
What about Diablo 3? That was the other one that killed me not being able to at least try.
Post edited September 24, 2016 by tinyE
low rated
avatar
Garrison72: To whom, from whom? Does he take money from the clan? You need proof for all of it to lead your little crusade.

You are an intellectual coward. Seen enough posts of yours to conclude that much.
avatar
Darvond: I've never seen a GOG ban firsthand, but you're in a hurry to test the system, it seems. Here you go. Archived.

He is/was the third primary fund source for the PAC, NimbleAmerica. Here is an article from the Guardian, a more mainstream source.

But the reality is, you could have just googled this yourself, but were afraid to face the reality of things.
You think I should get banned? I rarely call names here, but Breja's earned it. He's condescending as fuck, so I called him on it. Other than that...nothing. Downvote if you want. Lucky is backing shit posting, nothing more. It's harmless if you ignore it.
Post edited September 24, 2016 by Garrison72
avatar
morolf: I don't think you missed out on that much with SC2...multiplayer is too much work, not really fun (at least for me), only campaign I really enjoyed was the Zerg one...and they pretty much butchered the story. By the end of Legacy of the void (which is really lame...I liked the Protoss in SC1, but here they come across as pompous bores) I didn't care about that universe anymore at all. Too much mystery nonsense and too much retconning...ultimately it was a disappointment.
avatar
tinyE: What about Diablo 3? That was the other one that killed me not being able to at least try.
I played a bit one of that as well (mostly because an old acquaintance of mine persuaded me to do so), but tbh I've never been a fan of the basic concept...I didn't enjoy Diablo 2 that much, and Diablo 3 wasn't my cup of tea either. And I don't remember that much of it...sorry, can't give you a more detailed assessment.
low rated
avatar
sasuke12: He is becoming popular with the female voters because of his 6 foot 3 inch tall height, charisma, good looks and wealth.

And he has been in bed with many women.

I won't be surprised if he wins.
avatar
dtgreene: Note: This only applies to straight women. Lesbians do not find him attractive because, of course, he's not a woman and lesbians aren't attracted to men by definition.

Furthermore, it does not apply to more liberal women. In particular, fair-minded feminists would not want to vote for him, especially given his stances on abortion, and that his opponent is a woman with a more female-friendly stance on that issue.

Furthermore, atheists and those in liberal religions are less likely to vote for him. Also, educated people are far less likely to vote for him; that certainly includes educated women.
You really have no clue what's going on, do you? ;^)