Posted July 02, 2019
Specific comments to back up my suspicion: Stuff like "scum kickstarting a wagon" in post 211. (and your answer in 247 didn't make me feel better about your alignment; too many scum everywhere on the wagon)
I had the bad feeling in 351. Shame I never followed up with that check-up, though.
Bad feeling noted in 794.
You just never quite became a priority.
Post 211 - I'm putting my two cents about the whole thing with wagon positions on the table, saying that the voters themselves should be noted and gave HSL in Captain Sapphire as an example. The whole thing with "scum kickstarting a wagon" concerned the speed of scene's wagon building up. I'm saying that if one or two scum participated in it when it was already at five votes, all it could have taken is either two scum if one was on the wagon or one scum and one reckless Townie to seal scene's fate...you know, without even seeing a singular post from dedo and Micro on D1. That's my concern with the wagon, that scum could have been setting up for a bum rush.
Post 247 - This is what I mean by scum setting up for a bum rush. While it may contradict my claim that wagon positions should be prioritized less to who voted, I needed to acknowledge that one-vote wagons wouldn't take off the way scene's did, not without scum helping the wagon get on its ground this quickly.
Post 351 - Why? Because I saw blotunga to be leaning Town? I thought his argument that he should make his posts AI to sound more town than scum, as well as the play he had going for him. Him backing off scene's wagon when I told him he brought scene to L-2 sealed it even further for me, as well as the reasoning for it. Not to mention that it didn't take long for scene's wagon to suddenly shift to blotunga and get him done with, and MAFIA-SirPrimalform voting on him can be taken as indication that they did move towards him.
Also, please do that follow up on me!
Post 794 - I was more concerned that Joe put me as least towny when he mentioned that Flub being utterly wrong about GameRager appeared questionable, but all he had on me was "why are we assuming Pooka's town again?" eventually explaining his rationale to be "nothing UNdamning about you, Pooks." A couple posts later, he remembers my alarm on scene and puts me higher up on the list. Then again, if one follows-up on me, they might remember or even find new UNdamning things about me.
- supplementcene being supplementscene
- GameRager's weird play
I can actually say the same thing about gogtrial's own posts; they're also outshined by the above, and yet he's my best town read so far. Interestingly, you're putting me on the opposite end with the same circumstances.
To quote Lord Bane from Warlords 3: "Activity is often mistaken for achievement."
You note that Jack the Ripper (and the VT "claim") is a joke. You talk about his claim to be Buffalo Bill (with no mention made of lotioner), as if the name mattered. You later comment that you can't make sense of his early role claims.
You ask about what two town doctors on the same wagon could mean, and note that Joe later goes for me. You don't display that you drew any conclusions from these "interesting" ideas. You don't even try to talk about why they might be interesting.
You ISO'd Flub, and the end result is that you should hear someone else's opinion before forming your own. You took no stands, offered no ideas to try and resolve these interesting things you found.
I can't see the relevance, in any form, of half the things you found "interesting" (like the 'contradictory' cop/doctor "claim" from Flub; it is patently obvious that Flub can't be both).
About the early Flub claims, yes I can't make sense of them. Obviously the names are a start to something. Why would flub throw around contradictory claims, yet is bewildered by scene saying that his Ripper claim was a joke? On D1 nonetheless?
I remembered the Captain Sapphire game, where flavor names played an important part, especially at the last Day when HSL pushed the lynch of SPF (by claiming SPF had the name HSL actually had). If flub was trying to throw some light shade on scene with the Ripper thing, then what didn't strike me well with the whole Ripper and the joke thing is that scum have to put effort into finding out the town PRs, much less their names. Which means scummy scene couldn't have "known" if Flub was indeed joking or not.
About the doctors thing, notice that Trent on D3 has stayed on flub's wagon whereas Joe went for you. I'm taking this to imply there's a high likelihood Trent was the one to block the kill while Joe didn't use the one-shot protection on N2 (either used it on N1 or it died with him, latter more probable to me). If Trent was staying on Flub's wagon because he actually prevented the kill, then who was that nightkill and why did it make sense to stay on Flub? That's why I found the whole two doctors thing interesting.
About the no stands or opinions thing, I'm not really up for a mislynch toDay. Scene and GameRager looked undoubtedly scummy, yet they were MISlynches. I do have a stand, in that the stuff I found for flub pegs him as slightly scummy, but I don't want to jump the gun by calling him part of the scumteam. I want that input so we don't end up with a mislynch when we're at MyLo.
Give me a bump.
