Posted February 24, 2011
hobbes543: The more I hear about this game, the less I want to play it. Which is a shame because I enjoyed Dragon Age Origins. But limiting the character creation options seems like a big step backwards, as does the change to the conversation mechanics. I don't want another Mass Effect.
Over all DA2 seems like a very classic case of fixing what was never broken.
orcishgamer: It sounds like they've moved to what got a more positive reception, and that was Mass Effect on XBox 360. I don't think PC gamers really have a vote on this one. Over all DA2 seems like a very classic case of fixing what was never broken.
orcishgamer: Perhaps they'll base the endings more on game choice? Endings defined by which ass and biceps you want to look at throughout the game seems a bit shallow to me (besides, real men pick Dwarves every time!). I didn't hate Mass Effect, it would be interesting to have more varied endings, it's not impossible just because they removed race choice in DA2.
I didn't hate Mass Effect either. However I went into Mass Effect knowing Shepard was the character you play. The franchise was built around that idea. Dragon Age wasn't. I'm not a fan of the change they are making and thus will not support it by buying the game. Different franchises set up different expectations for what to expect from future games in that franchise. The multiple beginnings and the fact that the race and background you chose at character creation had effects on the game in how NPCs reacted to you and for me defined the franchise and is what made the game interesting to me. The move away from that goes completely against what I would expect from a Dragon Age game and by taking away what I thought was the most interesting feature also takes away my interest in the game. For me, without the multiple beginnings and effects of race choice, the game just becomes another generic fantasy action game with RPG elements to me.
Post edited February 24, 2011 by hobbes543