Sorry, got interrupted and called away.
supplementscene: TLDR I'm happy to lynch: Trent, HSL Pooka, SPF. And I'm willing to lynch: ZFR, Dedoporno, Blotunga. [...]
I've gone over your posts up to this one twice now. Still don't see why you'd be happy to lynch PookaMustard.
supplementscene: [...] have preferred to play secrethitler.io in my leisure time. [...]
I must say that I expected, or at least hoped, for more than this. While I can understand that one can't be in mafia_state_of_mind all the time, I'm rather disappointed to see this as part of the reason for your absence. At the very least, you could have popped in to say you're not in the right state of mind.
supplementscene: [...] So
@HypersomniacLive and ZFR have both accussed me of 'buddying' upto none other than Blotunga. Well this is suprising. Because I actually voted for Blotunga in the form of a shot because I thought Blotunga's analysis of either ZFR or Lift was insincere (I forget which). Where is the buddying HSL and ZFR? Please highlight it. [...]
supplementscene: [...] I await Hypers explanation to my 'buddying'. I'd move him to 'would lynch' now. 1 tactic Mafia will use is labelling players as a smear to form an excuse to lynch. I think he did that with his 'buddying' accusation but he could of meant something else so I await his response. [...]
Putting aside the fact that I never made a concrete accusation (you only have to (re?)read my posts), there's something about your early exchanges with blotunga (starting from post #67) that made me wonder if there isn't some sort of buddying up going on. Like neither of you were seriously squinting at the other one? They read to me sort of bantering, those "vote" exchanges between the two of you, along with the whole referencing of OMGUS-ing from past games included, i.e. they never even counted as votes in my eyes, let alone as serious ones.
And frankly, even now that you defend yours as a serious vote, I'm still wondering about those early exchanges.
supplementscene: [...] What do you think of Hypers sensitivity to the voting commands? Is writing
Shoot Player X instead of
Vote Player X really the big deal he makes it out to be?
It's not some personal oversensitivity on my part, votes need to be clear and not open to interpretation and/or retroactive enforcement for all the reasons others have already stated. That you don't think this is a serious matter, and have to ask, raises my eyebrow.
supplementscene: [...] @joesapphire hopefully you can get the night phase quickly coordinated
so we get back to playing ASAP [emphasis added]
Heh.
supplementscene: Below is the sign up thread for a game of Secret Hitler I'm organising.
It is higher priority as a responsibility than this game as 8 other players were relying on me. [...]
[emphasis added]
Dude, is this for real? After how your play has been received this far, you're telling us that another
game - let me repeat that, a
game - is of higher priority to you than the commitment you made when you signed up for this one?
Seriously? Are you trying to compete with Fran67 for the most careless player place?
If you've lost your interest in this game, can't handle all your commitments or whatever else and want out, ask for a replacement, don't screw over our game.
trentonlf: I find it interesting with Scene that once I started pointing out that he was not invested and his posts up to that point had been very blasé that he became a lot more active and started giving analysis. He used the excuse that he needed the day to progress before he could give any real analysis, and that excuse stinks IMO. My guess is he was trying to lay low at the start of the game and realized it was causing him to look bad. I could be wrong, but he feels off this game. I also had to laugh when he said “It’s been awhile since I played mafia, it takes 7 to lynch right?” Maybe he doesn’t know how to do math anymore to figure out what a majority vote is? Looks like to me that he’s trying to appear “unsure” of things to try and garner some sympathy. [...]
I was going to say that it is indeed interesting, yet that it doesn't answer my question of what you think of the fact that he doesn't seem to be concerned (tone in his latest posts still reads blasé), but after refreshing and reading his post #257, I may have gotten my answer.