Posted September 05, 2015
Runaway 2 The Dream of the Turtle
Commonly rated as the weakest of the 3 Runaway games but I'd argue that it is the best title in the series. Not only is it much longer than Runaway 1 and 3, it's also way funnier and has more epic locations.
There are one or two puzzles that are too obtuse for their own good but overall and unlike Runaway 1, accusations of being illogical are for the most part exaggerated and/or unwarranted. Runaway 2 is not an easy adventure game, it looks modern with its pretty background graphics but the gameplay is traditional and not always in the most accommodating way. If you decide to pass up Runaway for being illogical, you'll have to pass up the majority of classic adventures because most of them have the same amount of illogical puzzles. Runaway 1 had more poorly designed puzzles than than Runaway 2 but for reasons that make no sense, the second game is far less popular. Most likely, it's the open ended sequel effect. Part 2 of a trilogy is always a tough position to fill with only few exceptions where part 2 is the most popular (e.g. The Empire Strikes Back)
Runaway 1 made me laugh only once whereas Runaway 2 made me laugh several times, loudly on one occasion. Thanks to a monkey who is the secret star of the game. Runaway 3 is about as unfunny as the first game and is much easier. There are no clearly illogical puzzles in Runaway 3 but the game is the shortest of the series and the background art is less detailed.
In terms of story, none of the 3 games make much sense unless you switch into wacky adventure game suspension of disbelief mode in which case you'll be ready to enjoy these games for what they are, which is very wacky. At times, they are even more wacky than some Lucas Arts and Sierra games but due to the slightly more mature looking graphics, you might be mistaken to believe that Runaway is supposed to be more serious.
If you're willing to deal with the occasional improperly clued puzzle, give the series a try and don't skip the second game.
Commonly rated as the weakest of the 3 Runaway games but I'd argue that it is the best title in the series. Not only is it much longer than Runaway 1 and 3, it's also way funnier and has more epic locations.
There are one or two puzzles that are too obtuse for their own good but overall and unlike Runaway 1, accusations of being illogical are for the most part exaggerated and/or unwarranted. Runaway 2 is not an easy adventure game, it looks modern with its pretty background graphics but the gameplay is traditional and not always in the most accommodating way. If you decide to pass up Runaway for being illogical, you'll have to pass up the majority of classic adventures because most of them have the same amount of illogical puzzles. Runaway 1 had more poorly designed puzzles than than Runaway 2 but for reasons that make no sense, the second game is far less popular. Most likely, it's the open ended sequel effect. Part 2 of a trilogy is always a tough position to fill with only few exceptions where part 2 is the most popular (e.g. The Empire Strikes Back)
Runaway 1 made me laugh only once whereas Runaway 2 made me laugh several times, loudly on one occasion. Thanks to a monkey who is the secret star of the game. Runaway 3 is about as unfunny as the first game and is much easier. There are no clearly illogical puzzles in Runaway 3 but the game is the shortest of the series and the background art is less detailed.
In terms of story, none of the 3 games make much sense unless you switch into wacky adventure game suspension of disbelief mode in which case you'll be ready to enjoy these games for what they are, which is very wacky. At times, they are even more wacky than some Lucas Arts and Sierra games but due to the slightly more mature looking graphics, you might be mistaken to believe that Runaway is supposed to be more serious.
If you're willing to deal with the occasional improperly clued puzzle, give the series a try and don't skip the second game.
Post edited September 05, 2015 by awalterj