snowkatt: mostly by their interface
point and click games because thats what i end up doing at the time
Kardwill: That's another popular name, sure, but that excludes all the text-based adventure games, though.
Granted, they are uncommon in this day and age, but still... So the historical name has its advantages, even if it seems counter-intuitive. (And it can be. Personally, as a tabletop RPG fan, I tend to rant when I see what videogamers put into the "Role Playing Game" folder nowadays, but RPG is still a useful name when you want to talk about videogames and be understood. It's part of a "common language", even if the roots of the language don't make sense anymore)
It also excludes the controller-based adventures as well.
I've had this same discussion a few times in the past, and Leroux has covered most of my usual points. It's silly, the poor genre is so old that not only is it named in an antiquated fashion (the genre is named after the game it's cloning) but many of its
other names are just descriptions of interface. "Point and click adventures" only got called "point and click" because back in its heyday, no other games
were pointing and clicking!
I think my biggest point of aggravation is that it's the name of an existing literary genre. It would be as though we called every 2D shooter "Sci Fi" games because Spacewar and Space Invaders got there first.
I've been playing Adventure games since I was little, but I have no pride in its stupid, misleading name. If there was one genre I could rename entirely, it would be it.