It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
NoNewTaleToTell: Well I can't speak for anybody else but I'm firmly in the "I don't care about VR nor will I likely ever care about VR regardless of how far it advances" camp.
avatar
ET3D: That's a lie, of course. You will care, because hating is caring. When your kids call you and ask why they never get your presence, you'll lecture them about the value of true face to face and then go online to complain how far the world has deteriorated.

:)
Back in my day we had to read magazines or play our Gameboys if we wanted to ignore people on the bus/train/doctor's office! Not like you spoiled kids today with your fancy Shmansy VR!

Ha! I actually don't hate VR, it just doesn't interest me. Now if they ported the classic Playstation game Bushido Blade to some VR console/whateveritscalled then...well...I would eat my words with joy!
avatar
Klumpen0815: Oh, there's plenty VR equipment by now:
Interesting gimmics, but all.. so derpy XD

avatar
Klumpen0815: penis controllers[..]
Ugh..

avatar
Klumpen0815: the same with old people:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVjFOwyy06g
Hihi
For games? Nah. Needs massive improvement for convenience, immersion and not making people sick.

For augmented reality? HoloLens and Google Glass are already there. I don't know if it's a good idea or a bad one, but there's no stopping it at this point.
avatar
snowkatt: and cuts out a lot of people who have no depth perception
1 eye
That's me .
Just imagine the future - in order to play Dead Space X with the VR kit you have to put a diaper on first :D
avatar
snowkatt: and cuts out a lot of people who have no depth perception
1 eye
avatar
ne_zavarj: That's me .
I don't think that would be a problem though. You'd experience VR the same way you experience the real world.
avatar
CharlesGrey: Just for the record, I don't have much personal interest in the Occulus Rift or similar gadgets. I'm just puzzled why so many people bash the concept, before they've ever tried it out themselves. It seems most people who have actually tried the OR are really impressed with it -- in its current form, as well as its future potential.
I guess that all works, not to keen on the actual walking thing... give me a holo-deck and I'll be happy though.

And I wouldn't say I'm bashing it, or at least I don't mean to. I'm more or less questioning because I just don't see the possibility of it being anymore than a fad, I want to see it be good but I'm having troubles with it...

Which brings me to my next question... I've got glasses... I'm assuming I'm screwed than aren't I? I can't see 3D Tv's without my glasses (for some reason.. it's just 2 of everything but only in 3D movies) and with them on it's literally a pain. As well how does having a screen that close to you effect your eyes?

Again, not bashing just questions that keep me from having faith in this device haha.
avatar
cw8: I just want one to ride virtual rollercoasters!
Ditto. Although that would still make it a costly peripheral just for that. In any case, it looks like both Theme Park Studio and NoLimits 2 feature OR support now.
The big problem with VR is that by the time it becomes relevant and widely used, it will have become extremely dangerous. Human hacking will be a free-for-all, which will cause people to demand governments to get involved to protect 'human-computer rights' and we'll be that much deeper into the sci-fi twilight zone.

Call me old fashioned, but I like my computer components outside of my body and with my organic senses still in control. I have no desire to ingest games or live in some sort of Matrix/Lawnmower man AI bubble. Once total cognitive control is taken out of my hands, that's when I see my hobby go away.
avatar
CharlesGrey: Just for the record, I don't have much personal interest in the Occulus Rift or similar gadgets. I'm just puzzled why so many people bash the concept, before they've ever tried it out themselves. It seems most people who have actually tried the OR are really impressed with it -- in its current form, as well as its future potential.
avatar
the_atm: I guess that all works, not to keen on the actual walking thing... give me a holo-deck and I'll be happy though.

And I wouldn't say I'm bashing it, or at least I don't mean to. I'm more or less questioning because I just don't see the possibility of it being anymore than a fad, I want to see it be good but I'm having troubles with it...

Which brings me to my next question... I've got glasses... I'm assuming I'm screwed than aren't I? I can't see 3D Tv's without my glasses (for some reason.. it's just 2 of everything but only in 3D movies) and with them on it's literally a pain. As well how does having a screen that close to you effect your eyes?

Again, not bashing just questions that keep me from having faith in this device haha.
Yeah, no offense, it's just that I've seen similar negative posts about the technology before, usually from people who have never actually tried it.

Anyhow, I think it's not even a question any more -- this whole VR and 3D thing is here to stay. It's just a matter of time until the technology is cheap and advanced enough that it will be widely available to "normal" customers. You might even get your holo-deck ( or at least a cheapo knock-off of the "real thing" in Star Trek ), the only question is how long it will take. We'll probably be old ( even older ) farts by then. :P
Nah, VR is over-rated and in my opinion, "half-baked" in a sense. I will get excited when something like in Hack/Sign happens. The ability to actually "appear" when you log in to a game. How cool is that? It's still science-fiction territory for now though.

Realistically, I personally have some bias, as what VR will give me would be nothing but bouts of nausea from motion-sickness.
avatar
CharlesGrey: You might even get your holo-deck ( or at least a cheapo knock-off of the "real thing" in Star Trek ), the only question is how long it will take. We'll probably be old ( even older ) farts by then. :P
I don't see a big problem with making this holodeck, all you'd need are

a) augmented reality glasses
b) a specially designed blank room (maybe with curved walls) with some bright infra red LEDs
c) a white or transparent Cyberith Virtualizer in the middle of the room
d) force feedback suit
e) vr gloves
f) very sophisticated software

=> lots of money and space

Actually, most of this stuff is already out there and
I'd prefer this to the Oculus and it's brothers.
Post edited February 24, 2015 by Klumpen0815
avatar
the_atm: Which brings me to my next question... I've got glasses... I'm assuming I'm screwed than aren't I? I can't see 3D Tv's without my glasses (for some reason.. it's just 2 of everything but only in 3D movies) and with them on it's literally a pain. As well how does having a screen that close to you effect your eyes?
I had two different experiences, one with the Rift DK2, and one with a Samsung prototype (which is also Oculus based). With the Rift I need to wear my glasses to view the image correctly (it wasn't a problem to wear the Rift with the glasses, but they're rather small). With the Samsung I see better without them (and it's more convenient). I guess what affects this is the kind of lens the VR headset uses, and how it focuses the image on the retina.
The media in the field of computers and the gadgetfreaks are the only ones that are "convinced" to be honest, the rest of the world just waits and sees.
avatar
Strijkbout: The media in the field of computers and the gadgetfreaks are the only ones that are "convinced" to be honest, the rest of the world just waits and sees.
I wonder what motivates them to be so convinced... hmmm... I wonder. Big question.