LootHunter: See? You've even failed to know about that one thing, you specifically mentioned. How can you be sure that "class struggle" is a real thing, like Karl Marx claimed and not a conspiracy theory, like said many, who criticised his work? How can you be sure about all modern feminists' claims to be true?
jacobsclub72: You are absolutely going bananas, not only do you refuse to talk about the main subject but you want to play semantics when woman were able to vote.
Excuse me? The subject was specifically - "do you know exact dates and events in history". And you clearly don't.
jacobsclub72: "Some women were able to vote, so therefore oppression doesn't exist."
I never said, nor implied that. But apparently you think that oppression exist, even now, when women are allowed to vote, to work at any job same as men and overall have the same rights and opportunities.
jacobsclub72: Not to be mean but you have terrible discussion skills. Straight up questioning if class struggle exists.
Yes. That's exactly what is called "critical thinking". I'm not going to accept idea of "class struggle" (at least in a way that Marx depicted it), just on someone's say-so.
jacobsclub72: I cant spoonfeed you information if you refuse to look at it.
If by "refuse to look" you mean not accept it at face value, than yes. Why should I believer you and not people who critisized Marx and socializm in general?
jacobsclub72: Also I'm pretty sure the other poster is straight up lying. He gave links to a sexual assault in prisons only, which wasn't even gender based. And the other one was only about 38% men in sexual assaults. Also a link to a very uncredible website.
Ah, so NOW you started to separate sources on credible and non-credible. Yeah, and just earlier you've accused me of "playing semantics".