Posted on: October 21, 2025

AndersTC
验证所有者游戏: 5 评论: 2
almost good
the only reason im not gonna play this is because their is no building if there was building then it would be 2nd fav besids command and conquer
这对您有帮助吗?
© 2007–2009 Ubisoft Entertainment. All rights reserved. World in Conflict, Massive Entertainment, the Massive Entertainment logo, Ubisoft, Ubi.com, and the Ubisoft logo are registered trademarks of Ubisoft Entertainment in the U.S. and/or other countries.
MULTIPLAYER NOTICE: Online servers have been shut down, multiplayer is accessible only through a LAN connection.
MULTIPLAYER NOTICE: Online servers have been shut down, multiplayer is accessible only through a LAN connection.
Posted on: October 21, 2025
AndersTC
验证所有者游戏: 5 评论: 2
almost good
the only reason im not gonna play this is because their is no building if there was building then it would be 2nd fav besids command and conquer
这对您有帮助吗?
Posted on: July 9, 2017
killy9999
验证所有者游戏: 评论: 10
Arcade gameplay with no strategic depth
In this game each mission is in fact a series of dozen or so mini-missions revealed to the player as situation on the battlefield unfolds. Most of the situation on the map is controlled by AI and player only controls a handful of units. Needles to say, AI behaviour is scripted and your action have no impact on what will happen in other parts of the battlefield. And since you're in fact playing a series of mini-missions there is no place for strategic thinking and planning, no need to devise any sort of plan, nothing that I would expect from a strategy game. There is total chaos. Playing this game doesn't feel like commanding an army. It feels like commanding a fire squad going from one emergency call to another and putting out fires. This game tries to be a strategy but gives you tactical mission, except that it doesn't offer any depth typically present in tactical games. Also, there is practically no difference between playing US and Russians. One good thing I can say is that graphics is still good after a decade.
这对您有帮助吗?
Posted on: June 18, 2018
Chaotic-Entropy
验证所有者游戏: 254 评论: 3
Solid RTS, Works Almost Perfectly
Still remains a very decent RTS, part Ground Control and part Company of Heroes. I encountered a couple of cutscene crashes where I had to skip the cutscene to continue but apart from that it ran infinitely better than the Steam equivalent.
这对您有帮助吗?
Posted on: March 27, 2019
gianfranconerdi
验证所有者游戏: 570 评论: 23
Good RTS, even if somewhat short
Too bad the game can be completed in roughly 13-14 hours if played on Easy. I expected the campaign to end with the defeat of the USSR, but it ends right after you defeat the Soviets in Seattle; that's a bit disappointing. Not to mention you won't be commanding huge armies, but a maximum of 7-10 units (or slightly more, depending on your tactical choices) per mission. Still, a good game especially if bought on sale.
这对您有帮助吗?
Posted on: June 21, 2023
Jaspreetkapoor
验证所有者游戏: 16 评论: 1
Best Cold War Real Time Tactics Sim
This game has been a dear favorite since I first played in 12 years ago. I found it again on GoG and immediately bought it. Since then its been many hours of happy playing. I play the multiplayer with Bots and its a decentish challenge. All in all a great game with a great story. The only thing I would wish for is a random single player map generator to increase replay value.
这对您有帮助吗?
出错,请尝试刷新页面。
没有与您的要求相匹配的评论