Posted on: December 15, 2016

ExtremerBG

游戏: 1 评论: 1

Perfect game

Perfect optimization! Cool graphics!

这对您有帮助吗？

Posted on: March 9, 2017

Acend

游戏: 292 评论: 1

Too little too late

I succumbed to the hype train, as an old and jaded gamer I should have known better. Very little of what they had shown or talked about was initially in the game, with some items blatantly being lied or mislead as existing. This is all known. It has been several months not and this mediocre at best game has gotten some updates. Unfortunately these updates have been too little to late. This game should have had more testing and been rolled out as a "beta" as it still feels like they're working on trying to get to a complete game. Not worth AAA full prices or even half pricced.

这对您有帮助吗？

Posted on: December 13, 2017

Auditor7

验证所有者

游戏: 评论: 3

Not worth it

Its really interesting the first hour, but after that it really gets boring and repetitive. I bought it at a discount at 60%, but not even then its worth its price. In addition to being boring, it runs really bad. Even with graphics at the lowest setting, making it look really ugly, it still runs bad. Maybe its my computer, but why can a game like the Witcher 3 look and run amazing, and the same hardware barely can start up this mostly empty game?

这对您有帮助吗？

Posted on: August 17, 2016

jsol1337

游戏: 397 评论: 1

Boring, repetitive, horrible mechanics

I've played for around 20 hours thus far. I'm appalled at the lack of content. And it's not even what was promised vs what was delivered. It's that there's nothing there. Everything you would want in a sandbox game is just missing. The game physics and mechanics are all bland and boring. Flight is an autopilot affair when on a planet. It holds you at a specific altitude so you don't crash into the ground. You point the nose of the craft where you want to go, and it lazily takes you there. You don't control landings, just press a button and it will land. And never in the spot you want to land. See that landing pad. Let's miss it by 50'. The NPCs are non existent. I've seen more characters in NES top down RPGs. The aliens you meet in buildings just stand there. Doing nothing but occasionally waving their arms. They provide nothing to story or gameplay, and simply take up space. The buildings you were supposed to see were going to be randomly generated, and provide endless gameplay. There are around a dozen buildings, all the same, with the same loot inside. There's nothing random about them, as each one is prebuilt and then randomly placed at near equal distance apart from each other on planets. The animals, which were supposed to have some sort of AI, wander around aimlessly doing absolutely nothing. There's a bubble around the aggressive ones, and if you cross it, they will ram you and barely damage you. The peaceful ones just wander the planet, oblivious to you. Space flight is terrible, as every ship, from the smallest fighter to the slightly less small (but still single person) freighter you can fly are all identical in every way, minus cargo space. There's no crafting, no survival, no enemies, no flight, no RPG, no NPCs, no story, no adventure, no exploring, no danger, and nothing interesting outside of the first hour of gameplay. DO NOT waste your money. I haven't even gotten into the performance issues on PC, but I'm out of space in

这对您有帮助吗？

Posted on: August 15, 2017

Emob78

游戏: 193 评论: 8

Huge space sandbox with very little sand

I stayed away at the original launch due to the poor reviews. Since the Atlas update and discount, I decided to give it a try. NMS is deceptively shallow considering its scope. There's frankly very little to do, even with the Artemis missions and base building added. The missions are extremely limited and worst of all, cyclic. No matter how many times you start a new game or change the difficulty, the exploration and base building will have the exact same missions each time. So in base building it goes like this - build basic structures, plop down some terminals, hire specialists, do specialist missions, gather new blueprints to upgrade parts and buildings, rinse and repeat until finished. And it's like that EVERY SINGLE GAME. There's to divergence, no real randomness, despite the game's promises. The worlds themselves are basically the same. There's a few categories for planets, and each biome falls into these similar patterns. Dry arid, lush paradise, cold ice, and so on. That's it. There's no brown dwarfs, no gas giants, and even the planet sizes seem to fit to the same mold. The life forms follow the same pattern as well. 2 and 4 legged animals will dot the landscape of even the hottest or coldest of planets, yet they hardly vary at all, with the same pre-fabricated prototypes given only a few cosmetic differences. No giant fish, no packs of carnivorous dinosaurs, and certainly no infamous sand snakes. Lots of hot and cold planets with space cows roaming the surface. That seems to be the structure for NMS's entire galaxy. There may be wild variations out there, but after journeying to several different systems and cataloging numerous planets, I have yet to find any. No Man's Sky has amazing potential, but right now it's nothing more than a framework to which a good game could be attached. Perhaps with future updates or expansions it will become the game it was intended to be. For now it's giant toy box with a very poor selection of toys inside it.

这对您有帮助吗？

探索 CD PROJEKT RED 的游戏

精选

Featured

接近，但不是完全匹配

无人深空

Now including...

Embark on an epic voyage

Find your own destiny

Share your journey

Other ratings

Add a review

Edit a review

Delete this review?

举报此评价

其他详情（必填）：

举报此评价