Posted on: April 12, 2016
UthersonL
验证所有者游戏: 1033 评论: 23
Charmed at first, resentful by the end
The game has a couple of decent selling points: unusual cultural heritage, intended educational value and pretty visuals. Much to my surprise, it also supports Windows XP despite being a fairly recent release (late 2014) intended for current gen consoles; this is something I personally appreciate, since I'm desperately holding onto this ancient OS for the sake of older games. Just as the title of my review states, my opinion changed drastically as the game went on. I was initially charmed by the game's unique cultural heritage and attractive visuals. I liked the idea of unlocking little snippets of unfamiliar culture in the form of documentary-style interview videos (referred in-game as insights). The resentment came after a number of deaths resulting from the actions (or inaction) of the companion. For instance, the character you're not controlling at that moment might not "think" to get out of the way of spirits that fly around in a loop and instantly kill you if they snatch you. Or your fox companion, who controls spirits by proximity, might suddenly take off while you're holding on to a spirit platform or a handhold, causing it to disappear and send you to your death. On the other hand, if you play the game in co-op, you won't have that problem. At times, the controls didn't help the situation much, either. My other major gripe is with the educational side of the game. Those insights are too few and don't give you quite enough, despite being one of the selling points of the game and most likely the reason the game found support from various Innuit-centric institutions. Gameplay-wise, you could do much better in this sub-genre (highly scripted puzzle platformers, I guess), e.g. Another World, Limbo or Brothers: A Tale of Two Sons. Finally, the price-to-length ration is acceptable: about 5 hours for the main campaign and the Foxtales DLC, and you might enjoy the game more than I did if you play it co-op.
这对您有帮助吗？
