Error loading patrons. Please refresh the page and try again.
GWENT: The Witcher Card Game
介绍
免费游玩《巫师》世界中人气最高的卡牌游戏，快来加入吧！《巫师之昆特牌》融合了卡牌收集与交换元素，您将采用虚张声势的战术，快速做出即时决策，使用自己精心构筑的卡组在快节奏在线 PvP 决战中取得胜利。收集并号令杰洛特、叶奈法和其他《巫师世界》的标志性英雄，并用各种法术和特殊能力充实您的弹药库，为战局带来戏剧性的逆转。无论是经典模式、排位模式还是角斗场模式，都需要善用智谋，取得胜利。马上开始免费游玩《巫师之昆特牌》吧！
_(1).gif)
值得一玩的免费游戏
公平、有趣的卡牌收集进度系统，让您在构建一套竞技性牌组时的努力化为单纯的快乐——没有任何约束，就可以来盘《巫师之昆特牌》！贯穿整个棋盘的惊艳
美丽的手绘美术和极具魅力的视觉效果为每张卡牌、每场战斗和每个战场带来生机，让《巫师之昆特牌》既好玩，又好看！技术胜于运气
用纯粹的大牌正面硬刚，抑或用技巧以智取胜——《巫师之昆特牌》独有的三局两胜玩法为您打开一扇策略至上的窗子。游戏方式多样
无论是与好友快速在线对战，还是高强度 PvP 挑战，或是角斗场中的全新狂野冒险，都能在《巫师之昆特牌》的多种游戏模式中得到满足。规则简单，容易上手
将卡牌放置在两个战术排中——近战与远程。获取更多的点数来赢得一局，三局两胜赢得整个战斗。这并不简单，没人会小看它。手牌无限制
起始10张手牌，每张都可以在开局任意打出。由您来决定是以一个强力英雄开场，还是把他留到后面。您会组出怎样的牌组，又要采取什么战术呢？The game requires an online connection to play and offers optional in-game purchases.
CD PROJEKT®, The Witcher®, GWENT® are registered trademarks of the CD PROJEKT Capital Group. © 2017 CD PROJEKT S.A. All rights reserved.
所有成就
强势进击
在一场多人对战中对单位造成总计 30 点伤害。
common
·
41.36%
战争的艺术
在单回合发动至少 3 个单位的“指令”能力。
common
·
53.83%
掌握基础
完成基础教程。
common
·
87.89%
铁匠
在一场多人对战中，打出 1 张铜色牌和 1 张金色牌。
common
·
66%
一个不漏！
收集来自 1 个阵营的 50 张独特卡牌。
common
·
40.63%
毁灭者
用 1 张牌摧毁 3 个以上的单位。
common
·
40.94%
我要认真了
完成 3 场在线对局。
common
·
56.79%
有备无患
赢得比赛时还剩 2 张手牌。
common
·
30.8%
势均力敌
在一场多人对战中打平。
common
·
30.41%
包含内容
原声音乐（MP3）
原声音乐（WAV）
系统要求
最低系统配置要求:
推荐系统配置:
Time to beat
60.5 hMain
137 h Main + Sides
351 h Completionist
171.5 h All Styles
Game length provided by HowLongToBeat
游戏详情
DLC
评论
Game Informer
8.5/10
Gwent proves itself capable as more than a minigame, with mechanics that support intricate online matches that eschew chance in favor of tough choices
完整评论 »TechRaptor
9/10
Months after the final release, Gwent: The Witcher Card Game is still going strong. The minigame-turned-esport continually goes through iterations and patches, shedding skins and morphing into a real beast of a card game. It has a wistful past, a solid present, and a bright future.
完整评论 »
被评论
OpenCritic
用户评论
Posted on: September 19, 2019
FreelancerWhisky
验证所有者游戏: 评论: 1
One step forward, two steps back...
Disclaimer: I have achieved Pro Rank twice (I don't play much) and have experienced Gwent in all its forms (Alpha, Beta, and Release). I own 99% of all cards and have never purchased any card packs with money. I waited for a year and pushed hard in certain months to see whether new Gwent would grow on me and I still have the same issues. Pros: - No other CCG comes close to how F2P friendly this is. If you're new you'll have a deck that can reach Pro within a month. - Coinflip is less oppressive - No CA spies Cons: - An entire row has been removed and despite endless promises to make rows matter it has boiled down to "Can my unit use his ability on this row or not? No? Then I'll place it on the other one". Is this truly supposed to be better than early beta when all units were locked to a realistic row, or later in beta when all units were made agile? - Small numbers. The average bronze value of 12 power in beta meant that balancing was easier because CDPR could adjust incrementally. A card going from 4 power (average) to 3 power in Homecoming is a 25% nerf. In beta, losing 1 power would be an 8% (approx.) nerf. - Provision system is awful. Look at the leader abilities. Notice how 95% have 15 or 16 provisions? The only exceptions are chronically under-used powers (Tactical Decision, Ursine Ritual), abilities that got hit with nerfs in previous metas (Mystic Echo, Fruits of Ysgith), and Lockdown. In the beginning you could run a crappy ability in exchange for having better cards on average, or run a better ability with worse average card power. Now that everyone is basically on the same level at 15 or 16 provisions, all depth is gone. The old beta class system of bronze/sliver/gold was much better. - Tutoring has been obliterated and thus every deck has become more dependent on card draw RNG. - Mulligan system has been trashed. You can draw the same bronze card twice unlike in beta which had blacklisting for copies. - Artifacts are worse than beta weather
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: January 10, 2019
CKEROFBTHRM
验证所有者游戏: 39 评论: 4
I too was in the beta
I encountered Gwent and fell inlove with it while playing the Witcher. I wished they would make a separate game and after a quick search I found the beta in which I got head first. It was really simillar to the original at first and honestly quite exploitable. I stopped playing the beta and came back after a few months when the game got released and I was horribly surprised by how much it had changed. I was seriously giving up until I played a few games and got my ass kicked by some players which played the seemingly weak cards like magicians. I mean I started laughing when I saw what apparently nerfed cards in a well played deck could do in a game. It got a lot more ballanced I think and more demanding for the casual player which needs to use more grey matter when preparing a deck. Also, I know I've said it before :D, it got way more ballanced as you can easily lose a game with a great deck in front of a new player with a standard deck by making stupid mistakes. Also most of the time you win or lose to a small margin which emphasises the non pay to win characteristic of the game. It has a few bugs albeit and I personally try to improve on the game by reporting them but overall I think it's a masterpiece. GG CDPR
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: November 3, 2020
游戏: 0 评论: 3
CCG with all good and bad
+Great card art +Very generous f2p model +Nice cosmetics +Great love from devs, shown in a lot of new content -/+As every card game it is HEAVILY meta dependent and relies on the main gameplay loop -The main gameplay loop is VERY straightforward and gets dull fast. It can more or less be summed up as a "single/double digit addition/subtraction the math" game -Desperately needs more win conditions than just "get more points overall than that guy" -Not diverse enough. Alternate game modes are weak/non-existent -The graphic design is non-uniform. While the cards, avatars and frames are great, the boards and leaders don't fit and are lacking in comparison -Lacks identity in competitive vs. casual focus as all current CCGs do. With the card design and balance it tries to do both and fails to deliver either. (This seems to be a problem for most of the nay-sayers, cause in betas Gwent was definitely focused on fun/experimentation and casual experience and lacked the competitive integrity which it gained gradually.) I would say that Gwent suffers from the same illnesses all CCGs do and why the CCG game design is regarded as obsolete by some.
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: December 22, 2021
Tetro1258
验证所有者游戏: 9 评论: 1
Only Meta decks
During the game you will only meet meta decks such as vampires. skellige rain decks and nilfgard boring decks. Who likes it? NOBODY. I liked the game, but now it's just an annoying, stressful, repetitive and sad game
这对您有帮助吗？
出错，请尝试刷新页面。
This game is waiting for a review. Take the first shot!
Add a review
Edit a review
Your rating:
Stars and all fields are required
Not sure what to say? Start with this:
- What kept you playing?
- What kind of gamer would enjoy this?
- Was the game fair, tough, or just right?
- What’s one feature that really stood out?
- Did the game run well on your setup?
不当内容。您的评论包含不良语言。
不当内容。不允许使用链接。
不当内容。内容包含乱码。
评论标题太短。
评论标题太长。
评论描述太短。
评论描述太长。
不知道该写什么？
显示
5一页
15一页
30一页
60一页
排序
最有帮助的
最积极的
最严苛的
最新的
筛选：
没有与您的要求相匹配的评论
使用语言
English
Deutsch
polski
français
русский
中文(简体)
其他人
作者
已验证所有者其他人
发布于
最近30天最近90天最近6月任何时间发售后早期访问期间