Posted on: December 16, 2020

PaulJayP
验证所有者游戏: 24 评论: 1
3.6 roentgen, not great, not terrible.
The game at launch had issues, some cutsomers have had frame rate problems, crashes, last gen players seem to be stuck with poor graphics - we've all had bugs. This review isn't about that, all or most can be ironed out. Firstly, this game is more often than not a FPS. I believed and hyped this to be this generations successor to Deus Ex. An RPG where each action matters, how you build your character would matter in how quests can be completed etc. In my experience within Cyberpunk, none of this matters. The baseline for this company rightly or wrongly is the Witcher 3. The questlines in Witcher 3 are fun to play and really allow me to feel interested in how the story progresses plus it has replayability. The Witcher isn't the perfect game but its a good baseline to follow and improve upon. In Cyberpunk each quest follows a similar pattern, go to point A, kill all re-skinned gang members with the same AI, loot everything - end. No boss fights, no challenge no storyline changing dilemma etc. While Night City is fairly well designed I find the world itself still feels empty, there are side quests which are mostly uninteresting and seem to be only there to earn credits and street cred in order to buy the slightly improved version of the thing you already have. This game coud have been so much more, I feel it aimed to be somewhere in between Deus Ex, GTA and Dying Light but due to time constraints mostly failed at each of these as features/gameplay/quests/story had to be removed or modified during development. I would have preferred waiting another 3-4 years for CDPR to fully utilise their original vision. It took CDPR 3 tries to get the Witcher right, maybe by Cyberpunk 3 this series will reach its potential. Having said that, it is a game - for what it is, its fun to play but i'd rather play Witcher 3 again.
这对您有帮助吗?