© 2000 Activision Publishing, Inc. Activision is a registered trademark of Activision Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. All other trademarks and trade names are the properties of their respective owners.
Posted on: October 10, 2010
picklion
验证所有者游戏: 21 评论: 2
Good gameplay, bad bugs
This was a very fun game to play; a lot of improvements over the other civ games, particularly the techtree. I would have given a very positive rating except that the game crashes so frequently that it's not worth playing. I have yet to get through a game without it crashing; and no, you can't just save often, the same bug will crash you again as soon as you reload the savegame.
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: October 15, 2010
zaznet
验证所有者游戏: 14 评论: 3
Great Complexity!
The complexity of what you can manage in this game is by far greater than any turn based strategy game I've ever played. The predecessor Civilization: Call to Power was great as well. There is a chance to conquer your enemy with multiple types of subversion from religion to cultural rebellion. This was one of the best Civilization games of all time even though some licensing stripped the Civilization name away from it before it could be released. This game rivals even the most recent Civilization V (Civ 5) which I do enjoy playing.
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: January 27, 2012
MichaelFurlong
游戏: 237 评论: 12
A sci fi approach to Civilization
TLDR; A variation on the civilization games allowing the player to explore future technology such as mechs and aquatic cities. Nothing fundamentally new but offers a new twist on the basic civilization game. Call to power (CTP2) 2 was released before Civ 3, and shares the same basic gameplay of a Civ2/3 game, so if you don't like civilization you likely won't want to play CTP2. CTP2's major difference is that it deviates from Civilization's technological realism and allows you to play and research many years into the future with mechs, hover tanks, A.I. and aquatic cities. If you like the basic Civilisation gameplay but find it becomes repetetive and want a bit of variation in the gameplay now and again then I would reccomend buying call to power (and alpha centauri). I personally own CTP2, alpha centauri and Civ 4, and I switch between the games otherwise I get bored. I won't bother going into detail with the basic game mechanics as they are more or less the same as civilization 2/3 however it does have some noticeable differing features. The graphics are midway between civ 2 and civ 3, probably closer to civ 3.
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: October 2, 2010
coldheartzero
游戏: 17 评论: 5
Almost terrible
This is by far the worst of any "Civ" title. The AI was insane. One AI unit could demolish 2 or 3 of your equal units at any given time. Capturing cities required complete armies, but they could use 1 unit to take one of your cities, and the game was all but impossible to beat without being a full on warrior. While it did have some cool ideas, like the public works and water cities, the flaws far away the good stuff. Call to Power 1 is by far a better game of the Call to Power series.
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: December 29, 2011
Quad87
验证所有者游戏: 24 评论: 1
True successor to CIV II
Growing up, I loved Civ II, it was by far my favorite Civ game, and it still has a dear place in my heart. Call to Power is the sequel that I wish the newer Civ games could live up to. It's improved the graphics of Civ II, but without the corny 3D. The animations aren't breath taking, but they fit nicely with the feel of the game. Everything runs smoothly. It stream lines the building from Civ II, during the end game, it gets rid of the long sessions spent telling what to build next by adding in build queues. Great game, highly recommended.
这对您有帮助吗？
出错，请尝试刷新页面。
没有与您的要求相匹配的评论
Error loading patrons. Please refresh the page and try again.
