© 2006 Activision Publishing, Inc. Activision is a registered trademark of Activision Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Developed by Tilted Mill Entertainment, Inc. Uses Bink Video. Copyright © 1997-2006 by RAD Game Tools, Inc. Uses Miles Sound System. Copyright © 1999-2006 by RAD Game Tools, Inc. Uses Granny Animation. Copyright © 1999-2006 by RAD Game Tools, Inc. The ratings icon is a registered trademark of the Entertainment Software Association.
Please Note: Official multiplayer servers are inactive, Caesar IV is available as single-player only.
ACCEPTANCE OF END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT REQUIRED TO PLAY
Please Note: Official multiplayer servers are inactive, Caesar IV is available as single-player only.
ACCEPTANCE OF END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT REQUIRED TO PLAY
Posted on: July 15, 2018
mogami401
验证所有者游戏: 272 评论: 15
我终于入正了
哇，这个游戏我小时候玩了很长时间，一直在找补票（赎罪券），终于在这里找到了！ GOG版增加了高清设置，去掉了online模式，对新的操作系统进行了优化！ 这个游戏真的是Good Old Game，仔细看的话细节相当生动，比如制衣工坊没有活干的时候会放风筝，希望能出续作啊（虽然不太可能了） 感谢GOG！ 汉化补丁：http://dl1.3dmgame.com/patch/Caesar4_gb8.rar 注意，下载后为了安全请自行查毒
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: January 3, 2019
oghin
验证所有者游戏: 152 评论: 15
Walkers are gone!
I was somewhat suspicious initially, but I think I like Caesar IV better than III. The thing I absolutely hated about Caesar III and its family were the stupid walkers, delivering services along random paths. They condemned you to either build absurd cities with weird paths and no intersections, or to just accept that entire neighbouhoods would periodically fall into poverty as a key walker decided not to deliver some vital service for a few months. Personally, I chose the second option. Anyway, Caesar IV has a much more reasonable system for coverage, which is distance along roads from the relevant building. A few cons. - The interface is not very friendly. - Your advisors fail to give you some crucial pieces of information. - The combat system is horrendous. Consider yourself lucky if you're at all able to get your troops to attack the enemy (ok, not quite, but it's really awful). Luckily this is not a very big part of the game. - Somehow lacks excitement. There are no cool buildings to look up to building, unique challenges to overcome, or special map requirements. You can easily build a Circus and Coliseum on the very first day. Every map ends up being largely the same drill: build your city, develop trade, raise an army, send Caesar the required goods, wait. Just slight variations. Btw, I see some people complain about small map sizes... I had no problem with that. If anything, I regretted only using a small part of the map most of the time.
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: July 21, 2018
rtemperature
验证所有者游戏: 7 评论: 1
A beautiful game
In Caesar 3, because of the walker system, you cannot make your city the way you want to. You have to build housing blocks and carefully arrange your roads or else your city will crash and burn. This problem is gone in Caesar 4. In Caesar 4, you can build a beautiful city without worrying about your walkers. This means that in some ways, Caesar 4 is a much easier game than Caesar 3. Play Caesar 3 if you want a challenge and like to micro-manage. Play Caesar 4 if you want to build a beautiful, functioning city. Pros: Beautiful graphics, no more random walkers, more resources, no more ghost workers and population aging Cons: Even the largest map feels small, can be laggy if you have a large city, battle mechanics are still difficult to control
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: May 14, 2020
cmtracy
验证所有者游戏: 29 评论: 2
Overall fun city builder/manager
This game improves on quite a bit from Caesar III. Gone are the days of service-centered suburbs; instead of employees having to walk to houses, it's now a much simpler service area thing. Housing quality is also simplified and split into three classes, so no more worrying about over-upgrading your homes and losing valuable laborers. The one big drawback is the tiny and invisible plot grid. Whearas in Caesar III most strucures are 1x1, 2x2, or 3x3, IV has few structures smaller than 6x6 and a number at 12x12 and above. Without any sort of visible placement grid, it can be frustrating to try to expand a section at a time only to find yourself a row too tight years down the line. Other than that it does a decent job balancing the building and managing aspects, and doesn't let the military portion get in the way of the rest of the game. A little micromanagement when it comes to resource production but it's much more a blessing than a curse. And as a note, once you get past the tutorial the maps are plenty big enough.
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: March 1, 2022
Opiate666
验证所有者游戏: 11 评论: 1
Good, but not great.
In some ways I like it more than caesar 3 (you don't have to micromanage walkers) but in scale it falls short. Where as in previous caesar games you build sprawling cities in this its just a couple buildings. I've owned this game on other platforms since it came out and beaten twice. My main gripe with it is the maps are indeed cramped and the buildings are huge. Even the bigger maps later in the game just feel like they don't really give you enough space to build a proper roman city, and it in that way it reminds me of a scaled down ANNO, where its more about managing space on a tiny map for a handful of buildings. Not a bad game and worth $10 to people who like city builders but it honestly doesn't have the feel of its predecessors.
这对您有帮助吗？
出错，请尝试刷新页面。
没有与您的要求相匹配的评论
Error loading patrons. Please refresh the page and try again.
