最有用的评论

Posted on: August 4, 2011

n8mahr

游戏: 609 评论: 40

How to ruin a perfectly good series...

If you want an example on how to ruin a good game series - this is the one. Step 1) Take away the thing that made the predecessors great - turn based battles with units moving in hexagons - and replace it with an "semi-real-time", "semi-free-movement" thing that feels so absurd to play, you want to cry and BEG for the old hexagons to reappear. Yes, you still have "movement rage" (measured in metres or something) and, yes, it is still kind of turn based. But no way you can plan your strategies with this mess of range / positioning system. Step 2) Add something new which is guaranteed to annoy everyone - the rediculous electricity pylon building / maintanance system - you have to build pylons and pipelines which connect your main base with outposts and YOUR (constuction) UNITS !! Looks like they were chained to those pylons.. And if this wasn´t enough.. your attack units also need a "moving pylon" to supply them on the battlefield. Looks stupid, and plays stupid. If they wanted to get rid off ammo/fuel depletion, then why the heck did they implement this? Step 3) Mix semi-real-time combat with pseudo turn based (base) building to create artificial stress... Where "base building" stands for : build buildings for every one of the three resources, then connect them with the pylons/ pipes... wow! This game has absolutely nothing to do with the old (and great!) Battle Isle games. In fact, none of the old designers worked on it - "Cauldron" developed it, not the boys from BlueByte. If I remember correctly, by the time BlueByte was working on it, they were taken over by Ubisoft and their baby (Battle Isle 5 was the working title of this game) taken away. Hence this absolutely unplayable mess. DO NOT BUY, it is a shame for the Battle Isle series!

这对您有帮助吗？

Posted on: August 5, 2011

Kuroko

验证所有者

游戏: 454 评论: 8

a Hardcore strategy game for older veterans and new challengers

I think that it has to be stated that Battle Isle IV, unlike its predecessors, isn't a light strategy game. Instead it's intended for a more hardcore strategy game players and as such is a big turn off for many who are fans of the serie. I bought this game when it came out on a CD and I still think that the developers did a great job on this one. But they should have play tested this game better and get the issues with its design fixed. Luckily there are only few serious programming faults (most were AI related but developers patched them away) and most of the time game works like intended. True problems exist in the way game has been designed to run. Resource management is entirely real-time. Combat is turn-based. Sounds weird? Well, I assure you that it works better than one might think. Serious problems arise when you have to start arranging maintenance lines for your troops. Tutorials are very short and players have to learn lots about building troops, arranging troop transports, preparing for the weather, managing very limited resources, recycling, and research to mention few thing. Missions in this game can take several hours or even days if you're not executing correct strategy. It's almost impossible for first time players and probably in a time of 30 minutes to 1 hour you know if you have the wits to learn this game or not. If you choose to like it then it rewards you in many ways. I had once a multiplayer game which lasted for three days and I had lots of fun playing that game. We had four players doing all sorts of attacks and tactics. It's also possible for front lines to form up and hold up in larger matches. Which reminds me again about the power lines... I could write especially lot about how stupid idea the power lines are in this game. The point they drive which is to prevent players executing blitzkrieg tactics on a battlefield. Battle Isle: The Andosia War (both single and multiplayer wise) would be a really short game if players where allowed to build huge amount of fast attack forces. Unit balance changes in this game depending on amount of research done and favors greatly players with higher research priorities on one particular unit types. For example Air planes are more or less too powerful by default but have all kinds of limitations, with correct research path and ignoring development of ground forces on purpose players can end multiplayer matches in less than 30 minutes even on larger maps using only air planes. Of course fighting against the will of the developers and the design of the game is usually a bad idea and such instant attacks are costly for players executing such tactics. Unlike in games like Starcraft 2 where unit research has only a little to nothing importance on overall result of the battle, research is huge part of the Battle Isle 4. Visually Battle Isle 4 is still quite pretty game. Movies are quite artistic too. Voice acting is great and plot is interesting continuation of previous story lines. Music on soundtrack is awesome and it was such a pleasant thing to hear the main Battle Isle theme remastered and mixed in this game. I'd say that this game is worth your money. Its not a bad game itself but requires players to have whole another kind of attitude and genuine interest in this game. Battle Isle IV: The Andosia War tried to innovate but didn't quite succeed. And finally let me make a note that this game is not as hardcore as Gary Grigsby's games, not even close. Compared to "War in the Pacific", "Battle Isle 4" is as lightweight as "Command and Conquer". And highly enjoyable experience. Especially multiplayer wise. Thank you for reading all this.

这对您有帮助吗？

Posted on: August 5, 2011

Pickman

验证所有者

游戏: 228 评论: 4

Great Game

While I understand, that some might consider this title to be a desaster when compared to its predecessors, I think the game in itself is really cool. It changes the turn-based mechanics from the other battle isle titles a lot, but adds enough new stuff, to make it challenging and entertaining. I was hoping to see this thing on gog. It's a must buy for me. If you can let go of the original games and are open for somethin different you might as well give it a try.

这对您有帮助吗？

Posted on: May 14, 2012

boommc1981

验证所有者

游戏: 285 评论: 17

Tends to run stale

Battle Isle: The Andosia War, if you played BI: Insurrection you'll know the main cast of this game. But BI: TAW is nothing like BI, BI2, and/or BI3 were those games were purely tactical BI: TAW has a real time strategical element to it in which you'll have to build a base and manage it. The Tactical phase of the game is still turn-based. The including of the base management part is fun as it gives you something to do during the enemy turns, which sometimes are sooooo slow when the game is calculating the enemy movements. The missions are often quite long and segmented as in move units to objective A then complete objective B followed by objective C. After a while the tactical phases can get stale while you are twiddling your thumbs for the enemy to complete their tactical turn. The story/plot is quite engaging at least. 4/5 Stars, good game, but has it flaws.

这对您有帮助吗？

Posted on: August 5, 2011

Kilmex

验证所有者

游戏: 563 评论: 25

What did they dooooo?

I love the Battle Isle series. I played all and everything there was before Andorsian Conflict appeared. Allthough Incubation made me curse back then, I pre-ordered this game and couldn't wait to fight with tanks, buggies and Demon units again. And then this piece of ... software appeared. I installed it immediately the day it was delivered and could not believe what I bought: 20 minutes later I shut it down ... and left it ever since to stand next to the other installments of Battle Isle. I disliked 3 things right away: no hexagons for movement, instead some tiny squares to measure your troops movement (including there twist and turns); the need to support my troops with some kind of powerlines and distributors; all new troops - not a slowly starting introduction but BAM, here you are these units - go figure out what they are good for. I know - I could have ready the manual, but the other installments didn't need that to be understood. It has been quite a long time I tried Andorsian Conflict - and I went in, expecting of a "Battle Isle 3 with a modern 3D-Engine" thing, but old playing style. It disappointed me very much, but maybe I should give it another try, after all. Today I might just like it if I treat it not like a "Wannabe Battle Isle 3.5" :)

这对您有帮助吗？

...

用户评论

出错，请尝试刷新页面。

This game is waiting for a review. Take the first shot!

{{ item.percentage }}%

Awaiting more reviews

An error occurred. Please try again later.

Other ratings

Add a review

Edit a review

Your rating:

Stars and all fields are required

Not sure what to say? Start with this:

What kept you playing?
What kind of gamer would enjoy this?
Was the game fair, tough, or just right?
What’s one feature that really stood out?
Did the game run well on your setup?

不当内容。您的评论包含不良语言。不当内容。不允许使用链接。不当内容。内容包含乱码。评论标题太短。评论标题太长。评论描述太短。评论描述太长。

不知道该写什么？

由于以下原因，您无法保存您的评论:

您需要选择星级评分
您需要输入评论标题
您需要输入您的评论内容

筛选：

没有与您的要求相匹配的评论

English Deutsch polski français русский 中文(简体) 其他人

已验证所有者其他人

最近30天最近90天最近6月任何时间

发售后早期访问期间

探索 CD PROJEKT RED 的游戏

精选

Featured

接近，但不是完全匹配

Battle Isle: The Andosia War

Other ratings

Add a review

Edit a review

Delete this review?

举报此评价

其他详情（必填）：

举报此评价