Posted on: March 2, 2019

graynk
Владелец игрыИгр: 492 Отзывов: 3
Didn't live up to its potential
The first thing that cought my eye when viewing the store page for this game was the fact that developer was stating, that this is "NOT a walking simulator", when it clearly seemed to be one. I decided to give it a go, since it was on sale. It's a walking simulator. It has a lot of puzzles, but it's not a first-person puzzler, I'm sorry. The Witness is an FPP, Portal is FPP, Talos Principle is FPP. This is not that. I've read the post-portem in dev's blog. They've said that at first it was meant to be a horror puzzler, but they've changed the genre mid-way, because there's no audience for that. I honestly think it would work better for this game, than what became of it. In the later part of the game I thought "are they going to go dark with this?", it had a lot of potential to suddenly become really interesting. Sadly, it hadn't. In the post-mortem the developers wondered why the game didn't shift enough copies. I believe it's because not much originality was left in the final product. It's a solid walking simulator with an alright puzzles, a somewhat interesting story and pretty graphics. But it's got no hook. You may play this game and think to yourself "well, that was nice" and move on. Or you can skip it and not really miss out on anything. Lastly, the minor gripes that I had with this game: the backtracking in the later parts is tedious and there isn't any good reason for it. Some puzzles are reused, but not really expanded on (puzzle boxes, music boxes, garden gates). The voice acting was.. weird. That's about it, really.
вам это показалось полезным?