Предупреждение: первое время после выхода ОС Windows 10 будет получать множество обновлений драйверов и самой системы, что может повлиять на совместимость игр с этой операционной системой.
Предупреждение: первое время после выхода ОС Windows 10 будет получать множество обновлений драйверов и самой системы, что может повлиять на совместимость игр с этой операционной системой.
Posted on: September 21, 2009
Oneknown
Игр: 165 Отзывов: 16
Very good, but very hard
The fact that I tried repeatedly to win this game despite being killed dozens of times speaks volumes about how good it is. The fact that I've never gotten even 50% through, even with the help of a walkthrough should tell you how hard it is.
вам это показалось полезным?
Posted on: April 21, 2009
Zolgar
Владелец игрыИгр: 248 Отзывов: 7
Decent RTS, with a lot of flaws.
I honestly haven't played this one much. I'm an RTS addict, but this one doesn't do much for me. The campaign opens up very slowly with dull missions, and the technology restrictions are horrible. (I'm not a fan of tech. restrictions in RTS campaigns anyways, but this seems worse than most) So I left the campaign in favor of a skirmish. On to the skirmish: First of all, I LOVE the research system. The capability to manipulate your units and tweak them with various customizations. I like the fact that you only have to worry about 1 resource (al-la Command and Conquer). And the ability to have no unit cap. The limited number of buildings you need to worry about assembling is also nice. As is the capability to manipulate the terrain of the battle field. And the advanced AI options for your units is nice, too. Other than a platoon AI of "all focus on one" would be nice.. though it might be there and I'm just not aware of it. ... Now for the faults: First off, it's a semi-modern RTS, that does not use the standardized RTS controls. That doesn't sound that bad, until you actually try to play it (presuming you've been actively playing RTSs for the last 10 years). When you're not pressed, it's not an issue. But in the middle of heated combat, it's reflive to right-click to attack. Even the skirmish was so insanely slow! Starting off with 200,000 credits, and it still started low. And dear god don't get me started on the duration of research. Ye gods, even the most basic ones take no less than 2 minutes, and the advanced one take 4+ minutes. Not bad until you consider the massive amount of research there is to do. I tend to like RTSs where I can sit back and build a massive army and an indestructible base. But this one, fails to offer enough management on the build up of the base: Queue up all the research you want to do, set up multiple gatherers, set up multiple weapons factories auto producing good units. Beyond that you can explore the map, or send small assaults in to your foe every now and then. Or walk away for an hour, come back and queue up more research. Also the game wouldn't let me minimize it. I like to chat while I game. That pissed me off royally, but my rating isn't taking that in to account. Over all, this game has the feel of a Command and Conquer clone. Sure it has some unique elements, but unfortunately the main unique thing about the game seems to hurt it as much as it helps (the research. Awesome idea, poor implementation.) There are many better RTSs out there. But there are also a lot worse out there. It is one I intend to play more, some time in the future. When I have much free time, and no other game I feel more like playing. I would say for the $6, this one is worth a shot, as long as you're not looking for a Starcraft clone. (if you're looking for a faster paced RTS, go get Warlords Battlecry III, it's $10 here on GOG and worth every penny.)
вам это показалось полезным?
Posted on: May 5, 2021
midget_roxx
Владелец игрыИгр: 33 Отзывов: 3
Average
The 4-5 stars are from nostalgia. Essentially this game is a game of interesting ideas that had poor execution. The long running campaign, multi layer terrain, customisable units are all interesting concepts, but all the drawbacks bring it down. Very clunky UI, terrible laggy mouse cursor, balance issues, tiny minimap and bad pathfinding will really start to wear you down. I can't stress how frustrating the mouse cursor is. It has a refresh rate of something like 5-10 fps making it feel really awkward to move your units around. Additionally the hitboxes of the units fit exactly the model making it almost impossible to select moving units. Then the lack of hotkeys such as no land command will again cause frustration when playing. I wanted to like this as I did when I was younger but it really doesn't hold up especially when compared to other RTS classics like Aoe or Starcraft. If you do pick it up, if you play ED just spam the groznies in the campaign. The lack of shields will decimate your units and fliers avoid that type of damage
вам это показалось полезным?
Posted on: July 6, 2014
petitmal
Владелец игрыИгр: 163 Отзывов: 26
Pffft...
I totally disagree with these 'glittering price' reviews found here. Just a bag full of original ideas emptied on a carpet does not make a good game. It does not even make a mediocre game. It makes a game that sucks. I don't even know where to start if I would have to sum up everything. Base vs warzone concept is poorly executed hampering gameplay; awful (AWFUL) graphics; story is terrible even when taken into consideration it is a only an "in-game-story". Earth 2140 is the only game in the series worth buying. Also flawed, but at least very charming.
вам это показалось полезным?
Posted on: March 29, 2013
icor1031
Владелец игрыИгр: 31 Отзывов: 1
Doesn't work
Cannot access research menu, game crashes. W7 64 / 6950 / 2500k
вам это показалось полезным?
Что-то пошло не так. Попробуйте обновить страницу.
Отзывов по данным критериям не существует
Error loading patrons. Please refresh the page and try again.
