Posted on: April 28, 2019
craig_s_russell
Zweryfikowany użytkownikGry: 509 Opinie: 42
Seriously stuck in the 2000's
If you've played Syberia 1 or 2, then you've played Syberia 3....except they're much better games. Syberia 3 is stuck in the fixed camera 2.5D world of the 2000's. These type of games were okay fifteen years ago, but not in 2017. Microids should've either stuck with the original 2.5D engine, or done a proper 3D game with full camera control, zoom in/out and full support of both mouse/keyboard and controller. Also using the Unity engine didn't help. Everyone knows Unity is good for quick demos and proof-of-concepts, but not much else...and it really shows in Syberia 3. Syberia 3 looks like it came out around 2010...at best. The gameplay, dialog and puzzles are all circa mid-2000. I really, really wanted to like this game because I so much enjoyed the first two games. Fortunately I did NOT pay full price. $34.99 for this game is ridiculously high. I paid about $10 for it, and that's the maximum it's worth. Honestly $4.99 is a more realistic price. Here's why: Dated graphics; much weaker story compared to previous games; bad use of 3D; bad voice acting or voices that don't match characters; bad lip syncing with spoken words; unable to skip through conversations (first two games supported this); replaced multiple Save Anywhere slots with a single Auto-Save slot; mouse controls less intuitive and more complicated than first 2 games. If you haven't yet played Syberia 1 and 2, then get them. They're easily worth $9.99 each. But save your money and give Syberia 3 a skip.
Czy to było pomocne?
