Project Warlock © 2016-2018 Jakub Cislo "Buckshot Software". All Rights Reserved ©2018 Gamingcompany Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
Długość gry według HowLongToBeat
Posted on: July 6, 2025
zurowiok
Zweryfikowany użytkownikGry: 595 Opinie: 8
It's all right
OK shooter, spells and upgrades are a nice touch. I still have to try a spellcaster though, there seems to be very limited amount of points available. -1 star for being unable to save between levels and being forced to do a 4 levels marathons when you would like a quick shootout. This is devs being lazy.
Czy to było pomocne?
Posted on: October 20, 2018
skorpio
Zweryfikowany użytkownikGry: 18 Opinie: 1
Expectations not meet
Even if the game self is very nice, after some times it becomes so ripetitive, monsters are very similar, and the "corridors" are not well characterized. After one is death, I don't like to begin the game again.
Czy to było pomocne?
Posted on: October 22, 2018
duxcorvan
Zweryfikowany użytkownikGry: 2028 Opinie: 7
Nice try, yet...
Just a few hours into it, and I've experienced a mix of delight and frustration, with some really annoying moments. PROs: It's simple, fun, energetic and has the vibe of the early FPS of the early 90s. CONs: Vibe is the only thing it has inherited from those games. Mainly because: - Despite what young gamers are led to believe, running and firing guns was not all those games were about. There was good level design, a diversity of situations, some puzzles and some strategy in it. Generally speaking, it was not so arcade-y as you imagine, except for maybe the very first titles like Catacomb Abyss, Wolfenstein 3D or Planet Strike. And those games have not aged well: they were a shock back them because of novelty, but now they feel terribly boring after a few minutes. No Doom, Heretic, Hexen or Duke Nukem 3D here, those games used a lot of creativity and level design work that seems lost here. - If this game really aims at replicating the feel of those games, it must feature in-level saves and quicksaves. They were not there to damp challenge, they were there to skip frustrating backtracking and repetition, aside the fact you could have dinner, visit the loo, pork the wife, avoid a rant of your boss or sleep without losing progression. Without this BASIC FEATURE ALL 90s FPS HAD, and the fact that difficulty is kinda uneven, it feels like one of those hardcore platforms that masochistic kids like to grind for hours these days, but certainly not like any 90s game, easy or hard. - Performance is kinda subpar. It is not well optimized and uses a lot of resources. This is the only accurate simulation of my first runs with Doom, when I tried it (I should say "dragged it") in a PC 386 16Mhz with 2Mb RAM. Overall, not a bad game, but they need to address these issues. Good for a few runs, but not a classic -nor a good copy of the classics- at all.
Czy to było pomocne?
Posted on: June 10, 2019
wenslydail
Zweryfikowany użytkownikGry: 210 Opinie: 22
Short and Sweet
If I could give a 4.5 I would. Controls are tight and responsive, music is solid, guns+ upgrades are satisfying (for the most part). Lite RPG elements and sneaky secrets add a lot of replayability. This game is awesome and whether you buy it on sale or at full price you'll get your money's worth out of it if.
Czy to było pomocne?
Posted on: July 15, 2019
wagneraz
Zweryfikowany użytkownikGry: 450 Opinie: 8
Very Solid Shooter
I love the guns, the level design is fun, and I loved the retro graphics. It's a really good shooter! There really isn't too much to complain about here, except the upgrade system; that needs to be more robust. I really wish one could respec in this game, especially because some of the upgrades are quite terrible. So terrible in fact, that it would be better to leave the weapon as default rather than upgrading. Once you do upgrade, however, that's it, there's no going back or selecting the other upgrade. The only other problem was how easily one can die from falling in some of the later levels. That was quite a pain in the butt. Other than that, I would say this game should get a 5/5, but the problems that the game has are just a little too big to ignore. 4/5 is therefore what I said. It's good!
Czy to było pomocne?
Coś poszło nie tak. Spróbuj odświeżyć stronę.
Brak recenzji spełniającej wybrane kryteria
Błąd wczytywania GOG Patrons. Odśwież stronę i spróbuj ponownie.
