Please be advised that Windows 10 operating system will receive frequent hardware driver and software updates following its release; this may affect game compatibility
Please be advised that Windows 10 operating system will receive frequent hardware driver and software updates following its release; this may affect game compatibility
Długość gry według HowLongToBeat
Posted on: May 4, 2010
NiknudStunod
Gry: 41 Opinie: 1
Not even worth 1 star
do not use 1 and 2 as your decision on purchasing 3. This was the first time I almost cried over a video game. I would move right to Galactic civilizations after playing MOO1&2
Czy to było pomocne?
Posted on: October 22, 2014
Lumarra
Gry: 60 Opinie: 1
MOO3 in basic terms...
You know when you were little and you got a toy and it had all these gadgets and readouts that would've been really cool if they actually worked and meant something? MOO3 is the gaming equivalent of that. Consider yourself edumacated...
Czy to było pomocne?
Posted on: May 4, 2010
Kyrone Rustmore
Zweryfikowany użytkownikGry: 268 Opinie: 2
Seriously not worth it.
I loved the series, this game I had high expectation of coming years after the master of orion 2 was released. Alas this was a disappointment. In all honesty, I don't even thing it should be on good old games, it's not old enough or good enough and with the amount of frustration the intrusive AI and lack of control caused it could bearly be classed as a game.
Czy to było pomocne?
Posted on: May 20, 2010
Necro55
Gry: 141 Opinie: 8
Frankly, shouldn't have call Master of Orion
Getting past the point that I did not enjoy the game. I tried, several times, I understood it, I had no problem with the spreadsheet like number crunching, it wasnt that complicated, just wasn't the best layed out. If all the sliders and resourcing etc was too complicated, stay away from Gal Civ2. Anyway, aside from a halfbaked attempt to be a continuance of the original (story wise). If you read all the backstory prior to launch this was WAY in the future from MOO2 and had already had a Dark Ages in Space, for lack of a better description. But aside from the fact that they are both space Strategy games and a few of the names remained, this is not MOO. MOO2: fine tune and control EVERYTHING. MOO3 tune little, control less MOO2: Build what you want, when you want (provided tech is there) MOO3: It tried to automate everythign for you, and did it in unimpressive fashion MOO2: Outfit and organize you fleet how you see fit. MOO3: NOT ANYMORE! If you want a fleet of between X-Y ships it requires, 3 pint defense, 2 carriers, 5 Dreadnaughts, 4 destroyers, 7 Token Ring ships. Basically 2/3 were there to be bullet sponges MOO2: Planet admin guys offered static buffs and debuffs, perhaps some interesting other perks. MOO3: Admins took over, and argued and generally fought against me. (perhaps more real to the politics side of it, but thats NOT what I played a game like this for). MOO2: All forms of weapons were very viable. MOO3: Build lots of missiles for combat ships. You Win, easy as that. MOO2: Everyone is on the council, period. MOO3: At least at release time, you had to chose it as a customization option, or pick one of the canned "upper" for lack of a better term races. MOO3: Graphics were a selling point. MOO2: Was good enough you didn't care what the graphics were like. Basically so many things that defined the type of game MOO1 (played a little) and MOO2 (played crap loads) the games they were was gone for MOO3. They wanted to design a new game, thats fine, have at it. But don't call it a sequal to a classic just to ride on its coat tails to game sales. It may be fine for its type of game, but I don't dig that type of game. Its like getting a Sex Pistols CD, opening it, seeing Sex Pistols on the CD itself, and putting it in and hearing Greenday. THAT'S NOT WHAT I PAYED FOR! Basically, they took advantage of a name, at the fans expense.
Czy to było pomocne?
Posted on: April 27, 2014
Big.S.Rucker
Gry: 7 Opinie: 1
Dear God, Do Not Buy It!
I honestly cant say that i enjoyed any aspect of this game, and unfortunately, yes that also means the ship combat. How on earth do you take out one of the best aspects of the MoO series?! I was not born around the time Master of Orion 1 came out, and i was really young when number 2 came out. When my uncle introduced me to the Master of Orion series, i was hooked. I had never played a series of strategy game that kept me coming back for more, whether i won or loss. I was so interested, that I decided to see what other games my uncle had. As i was digging through his collection, i came pass the god forsaken Master of Orion 3. I was so Naive at the time that i wanted to try it out. My uncle had to have warned me at least 9 times that it was not even worth installing. I read the manual with all the races, and the graphics, i just thought that it couldn't be all bad. I have lost count of how many times i have installed and uninstalled this game, believing that perhaps i just missed something, or maybe I'll get better, but to no avail. This game is just pure bad. It was like the developers got our love with Master of Orion 1. They made Master of Orion 2, and we thought it was a gift from god. Then they played a cruel joke by giving us a game that they created while they were drunk and on drugs on a Monday. This game is really not worth it
Czy to było pomocne?
Coś poszło nie tak. Spróbuj odświeżyć stronę.
Brak recenzji spełniającej wybrane kryteria
Błąd wczytywania GOG Patrons. Odśwież stronę i spróbuj ponownie.
