Gra wymaga połączenia z internetem i umożliwia dokonywanie zakupów.
CD PROJEKT®, The Witcher®, GWENT® are registered trademarks of the CD PROJEKT Capital Group. © 2017 CD PROJEKT S.A. All rights reserved.
Długość gry według HowLongToBeat
Posted on: January 14, 2019
BibuGwent
Zweryfikowany użytkownikGry: 2 Opinie: 1
Great
I love this game Dont listen to other ppl, the old gwent sucked., boring as hell... Just try this one, its better, more fun, and addictive. See you in game !
Czy to było pomocne?
Posted on: January 14, 2019
Esmer
Zweryfikowany użytkownikGry: 56 Opinie: 1
Homecoming killed Gwent
Before Homecoming Gwent used to be one of the best CCGs where skill really mattered and was far more important than RNG. Even card draw didn't matter much, because there way many ways to thin through your deck and get the cards you need. It used to be one of the few CCGs where you could have a winrate of 70-80% simply because you were good at deckbuilding and playing, not because your opponent draw better or you didn't draw your key cards. In Homecoming they destroyed all of that and reworked many of the cards' abilities to be absolutely binary, i.e. "if you don't have a perfect answer, you lose to that card". Coupled with the lack of deck thinning and blacklisting during mulligan, this makes the game much more reliant on draws, i.e. RNG. Not only this, but there are much more cards with RNG effects, making the game less dependent on your skill. Along with that they also reworked the ladder (ranked gameplay) so it requires much more grinding to reach top ranks. For instance, before it was possible to reach the highest rank by winning 2-3 games a day during a month (so 60-90 games in total). Now even with 100% winrate you need over 120 games! This is ridiculous. Then, they destroyed a lot of the established archetypes by removing or reworking cards. Gwent is probably the only game that had more content (around 20% more cards!) in beta. I could go on and on, but to make long story short: CDPR took almost every single thing that made Gwent stand out among other card games, and destroyed or made it worse in Homecoming. Essentially, version 1.0 is another beta. And the most important thing: I am giving Homecoming 1/5 not because it's not the game we beta-tested and not because it's worse than beta Gwent. I am giving it 1/5 because it's a bad game by itself. There are too few cards, too few different game mechanics, leading to too few deck varieties. And binary card design (like artifacts) coupled with inconsistent draws makes winning a losing far too random.
Czy to było pomocne?
Posted on: January 29, 2019
Gry: 0 Opinie: 2
Świetna
Bardzo łatwo i szybko można skompletować talie które można uznać za T1
Czy to było pomocne?
Posted on: February 28, 2019
Maraz80
Zweryfikowany użytkownikGry: 10 Opinie: 2
Ssie
Gra ogólnie ssie. Źle zbalansowana, długo losuje przeciwników, tasowanie decku to jakaś komedia. Spędziłem przy niej sporo czasu i rzeczywiście potrafi zainteresować na początku ale z czasem po prostu męczy. Punkty zdobywa się bardzo mozolnie i budowanie decku zajmuje dużo czasu. Wiadomo że płacący dostaje więcej ale ogólnie na mini grę słabo.
Czy to było pomocne?
Posted on: March 19, 2019
HarleyQuinn1979
Zweryfikowany użytkownikGry: 16 Opinie: 5
Nearly frustrating like Hearthstone
Gwent have potencial for be a very good online cardgame, but it is also on the way to do the same ballancing failures like hearthstone did and much players left there. When I look in season of bear. So much players play the overpowered Skellige Deck... Frustrating 100% Gwent needs much more Balance and it must be fast in the next time not like in a year or something...
Czy to było pomocne?
Coś poszło nie tak. Spróbuj odświeżyć stronę.
Brak recenzji spełniającej wybrane kryteria
Błąd wczytywania GOG Patrons. Odśwież stronę i spróbuj ponownie.
