The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings Enhanced Edition

I'm trying not to go in depth, but in brief I avoided this series until now, due to the reputation for titillation and being excessively 'grimdark'. Now that I'm finally playing it, my biggest problem is not the 'power fantasy', where you are enjoying a young boy's fantasy of every female character in the game wanting to get into your pants. The sex cards from W1 didn't bother me. My problem is the other side of it - OK, you're playing through a power fantasy, all the women want you and are young / beautiful / dressed in revealing clothing, fine! But why does it all seem so miserable? Why are women constantly getting called or calling each other b****es and s**ts and w***es? Why is it every woman in a position of 'power' is called sexual slurs or has her sexual availability commented on? Is that a key part of the fantasy? Is it hard to imagine women choosing to sleep with you if they also feel valued and respected for things beyond their sexuality? Or is this all for the sake of realism? But does it make sense to argue that it was 'for the sake of realism' when we are also fighting magical monsters and shooting fire from our hands? If this is what you imagine might bother you as well about a game like this, I found Witcher 2 to be a much worse offender than Witcher 1. At least that game was silly and juvenile about it. This game dials up the angst to 11, especially when it comes to the 'grimdark' fates of almost all of the major female characters. The constant side remarks 'must be her time of the month' 'time to go to the brothel again' 'phew we can talk freely now that the women are gone' etc are just the cherry on top. It might be 'realistic' or it might not but again, if we can shoot fire from our hands, clearly there have been some editorial choices about what 'realism' is and isn't integral to this fantasy.

And this is tale hails from Poland. A mysterious country in eastern Europe. A place proud of it's heritage and proud of their artisans. One such artisan a grumpy old fellow named Sapkowski decides to write a series of novels that will soon capture the attention of reader inland and from shores far away. In fact said tale is captivating that it spawned a slew of media projects So why the 1 star you are asking? Welp unlike most gamers I tend to foster an esoteric hobby of mine which is called reading. I was a kid back then and there I read a captivating story about doomed hero. A white wolf. His skin? The color of bleached skull. His sword? A creation of chaos. His fate? Doomed in a changing world. His profession? That of a mercenary Now here is the confusing part. His name? Elric of Melnibone. Wait a second! Who dared to plagiarize Sapkowski legendary novel? None other than its original creator. An amicable old fellow named Michael Moorecock So? who cares? Sapkowski only copied the character. Did you know that GRRM (a song of ice and fire) has a character called John Snow who owns an albino wolf with red eyes? Yes I do. In fact old boy George and Michael are good friends. GRRM never attempts to lie about the homage he is paying to his friend So what's your point snob? Sapkowski copied all concept from Elric of Melnibone. All of it.

I've downloaded this game, but I can't find BONUS with music etc. Where I can find it ?

WITCHER 2: ASSASSINS OF KINGS , I really want this game , Can you send me ? Thank u

This is easily my favorite of the 3 Witcher games to date, and I'd say I enjoyed my time with it, but it was just fine. The combat wasn't bad, but it was a little sluggish for my liking, and switching swords only really happens when it feels like it; I'd sometimes have to tell it 3 or 4 times in a row before it'd happen. This was definitely streamlined from the first game, which isn't bad, but I didn't dislike the researching elements. I would've liked more big monster battles in this, too; the first big monster you fight is really exciting, and after that, you don't really get much of anything else like it. For a game about a monster hunter, that was a bit underwhelming for me. The writing still wasn't great; it kept telling me that Geralt hates politics, but you keep getting forced into political involvement. Sure, these things can happen, but why write it that way? More than that, none of the characters really hooked me, and most of the time, I wasn't really invested in any of the things I was doing. Now, I love Mega Man, so that's not a dealbreaker on its own, but if the gameplay isn't that interesting, either, then what's left? My favorite thing about the game was seeing all the different armors on my character, and that should be pretty telling. The game isn't bad at all, and of the 3, it's the only one that I finished, but I didn't think it was outstanding, either.