Posted on: July 22, 2019

a-p-petrosyan
Possesseur vérifiéJeux: 148 Avis: 6
The Half Life 2 of RPGs.
This is a fun game. Some people might assume from the presence of combat, rolling blocking and many other hack and slash adventures that the witcher 2 is more akin to hack and slashers like Dark Souls or Lords of the fallen. Indeed, association with Bandai Namco can give you that impression. However, this is a story-driven game with some combat to break up the boredom, much like the first witcher. Why? Combat is a nerve wracking dice roll. It's unresponsive, clunky and as opposed to Dark Souls, completely unfair. The beginning of the game you are a wuss. You can fight, but you deal very little damage, take a ton, and can only use signs once every minute. But that's the point. You shouldn't engage in combat, magic is of limited use, and planning is everything. Traps deal excessive damage, knives are far more effective than igni, and once you get past the first few missions, you'll have a witcher that can actually deal some damage. In fact, even on Dark, if you don't die within Flotsam, you can beat the rest of the game without ever coming close. The game forces you to think deliberately about what you want to do: you need to meditate before each engagement, to plan, to stock up, equipment accounts for your usual progression, because witcher skills are few, far between and not strictly for that purpose: they're more tactical opportunities rather than incremental upgrades. I love it.One of the main reasons why I bought this game after pirating it a long time ago. A nice bonus is that this game tried to go out of its way to be as visually impressive as possible. It has a lot of nice touches, like hidden loading screens that don't even show up on an SSD. It has one of the few non-ENB implementations of Bokeh (which admittedly looks far too intense and is sometimes too distracting), and Ubersampling: it renders two frames in time, and takes the average of the pixel colour, which naturally halves your FPS. It's surprisingly less efficient than 4x supersampling.
Trouvez-vous ce commentaire utile ?