Posted on: October 9, 2024
Revue de l'accès anticipé
seelenernter
Possesseur vérifiéJeux: 218 Avis: 8
no idea why this has such a high rating
The game is in early access, ok, But what is delivered here is barely an alpha. Also the devs had roughly 1,5 years of time to patch the glaring deficiencies, but the result? Sadly, almost nothing. Instead of tackling problems, they just flush out more of the same. To name just a few: # terrible performance even on the recommended hardware even when lowering the settings, it's highly subpar, especially when looking at the quite dated graphics. Vanilla Skyrim looks often better and almost always more atmospheric. # bugs rarely had a game where crashes/freezes were that common. As advised by others lowering the graphics to minimum helped, a bit. Still quite a lot crashes, and the game looks like early 2000s now. Add the very poorly made animations, where often enemies slide over the ground (too slow or wrong animation), the buggy lighting with torches, etc, and one really has to ponder if this is an unfunny prank. # the quest/story design "go there, fetch that, defeat x" ... MMO-grade. Few quests try to do better but still feel blunt n clumsy. # the "balancing" If you can call it that... archery is OP as heck, summoning pretty much completely useless, and weapon difference within a category way to small, etc. For example: even the strongest summon, with all health perks, is a 1shot for simple bandits. On the other hand, a lightning spell, that is AoE 1shots packs of almost every enemy. And no, this is no expensive super-spell. TBH this would be solid 1 stars for me... why 2 stars? Because at least some of themost basic concepts are interesting. For example, that the player can go to a cemetery and defeat a necromancer and in the end can make use of his research by looting a spell book/scroll from them, and so receive a completely new gameplay element with the ability to summon skeletons. Sadly that's where any goodness ends, because how it was implemented and balanced, ruines it all once again. Would like to be more detailed, but the message limit prevents it.
Trouvez-vous ce commentaire utile ?
