Posted on: June 16, 2023

AdrianJacek
Jeux: 241 Avis: 3
Neither MI 6, nor MI 3a.
The game is not a follow-up to Tales. In fact, it contradicts things from Escape & Tales, probably even Curse. The game is also not the fabled Monkey Island 3a, the follow-up to MI2 that ignores later games in order to fulfil Ron Gilbert's "true vision." It's an odd, little thing that seems to primarily focus on subversion and deconstruction of Monkey Island tropes. While also relying on nostalgia more than any other game in the series. In that sense, I think there's not much value to this particular game compared to all the previous instalments. For the lack of a better word, it feels... petty. Curse, Escape & Tales respected what came before and worked within the pre-established continuity. They were not perfect but neither were the first 2 games. Return... does not respect what came before. At face value it might appear that it does - after all, every game is mentioned in the scrapbook. But no. The game fails to be Monkey Island 6, it fails to be Monkey Island 3a, it fails to be anything at all, really. It's just a big "take that" from Ron Gilbert.
Trouvez-vous ce commentaire utile ?