Pathfinder: Wrath of the Righteous - Enhanced Edition

Bibliothèque

3.4/5

( 358 Avis )

3.4

358 Avis

français, English & 6 de plus

Posted on: September 22, 2021

Rndl99

Jeux: 298 Avis: 9

Political agenda

4/5 or even 5/5 for most of the gameplay, combat, character generation with multiple classess and races. 3/5 or probably less, for story and writing. 1/5 for plethora of bugs, performance issues, broken quests, etc. Kingmaker was even worse in this regard but that's not an excuse. Again, using players for testing. 1/5 for WXYZ agenda thrown at the player from all possible corners. You are greeted by two lesbians - hell, maybe even one of them shemale - that play very important part throughout the story. Later on you meet one gay, one male bi, each flirting with the player character from the start, few hours later a fallen succubus - which is probably the most sincere of them all - and some time later after reaching certain council, you get a sex offer from a demon lord in male form. At this point I'm kinda afraid of continuing. What's next? Optional demon orgy in the abyss? Is this really what the community wants from CRPG? Date/sex sim with all alphabet letters and configurations? If that's the case, I'm not sure I want to be a part of such community. I preordered Wrath because I liked Kingmaker. True, alphabetic agenda was present in the first one as well, but was entirely skippable as a side content. This time, not so much. I will not repeat that mistake. If I ever consider buying anything from Owlcat, I'll check first for any political crap they may force in the game. If it'll be like in the Wrath, that's a huge skip for me.

Trouvez-vous ce commentaire utile ?

Posted on: December 2, 2024

LordasSniegas

Possesseur vérifié

Jeux: 90 Avis: 3

Spyware

Wow, spyware from ruzzian based devs, how shocking

Trouvez-vous ce commentaire utile ?

Posted on: September 21, 2021

Eldwen

Possesseur vérifié

Jeux: 72 Avis: 3

Tedious, uninspired, pointless

The short version: Give this game a hard pass. It’s a tedious waste of time. Go play Pathfinder on a table top, as it was intended to be played. Patches will not improve it. It’s flawed at its very core due to poor design, poor implementation, and poor writing. That said, it is a stark improvement over Kingmaker. Grade: D+ To start, let’s discuss the positives: 1. Good companions. Many of the companions are written quite well, providing interesting and often heartbreaking stories to compliment what drives them to fight the Abyss. 2. Interesting locations. The World Wound provides an interesting jumble of fantasy landscapes that all huddle together, and the game is set in late Autumn, allowing for beautiful winter vistas in some places. 3. A decent variety of classes. Note: decent, not good. There’s a wide variety of classes that give unique and different takes on different playstyles, providing some tweaks to different formulas. See Balance below. Now, the negatives: 1. Turn-based mode. It is garbage. The game doesn't use a logical turn-based mode system - instead, it tries to enforce as much PnP rules into a virtual environment as possible. Instead of having a smooth combination of turn-based and RtwP (think Neverwinter Nights), you have two systems that don't really work. 2. RtwP mode. It is also garbage. 3. Balance. I can hear you already – it’s a game with the Mythic rules. Who cares about balance? I really understand that perspective, and I share it to some extent. But, the Mythic system is probably the best part of the game. Otherwise, all the classes are horrendously balanced and there are options that vastly outclass other options. The mythic paths also favor certain abilities - making them mechanic choices, instead of roleplay choices. 4. The writing in general. This isn't Owlcat's fault, but most Pathfinder APs are just... Bad. I genuinely wish they'd just hire some writers and have Paizo approve their own storyline. It's power fantasy drivel.

Trouvez-vous ce commentaire utile ?

Posted on: September 27, 2021

Anfet

Possesseur vérifié

Jeux: 70 Avis: 3

Great

It's a very very EPIC game. 80 hours of play, and still nowhere near end. Can you play it again? I don't know. Most notable positive things: - STORY. It's vast and awesome. - Translation tp major languages in fantasy style with modern slang. - Graphics are modern for isometric. - Companions are colorful, each with it's own story. Negative things I've encountered after 80 hours of play: - Loadings. loadings everywhere. And they are quite slow. - possible spoiler, beware. There is a certain changing city that changes and it's annoying as hell, because you cannot move where you want and need to WAIT for city to change again. It slows moving, and you cannot actually understand what is where. There is also tons of bugs with it, when you exit the building and appear in space. - FPS is random. From 60+ to 5-6. Can drop everywhere and without reason. - Overwhelming DnD settings? I'm used to lots of spells, but here you get so much of abilities, it's hard to understand what is for what. And you get them all the time. - Enemies saving throws are too much for normal game. It feels like all control spells are useless on rare+ mobs. - Mobs are getting overpowered. A tanky paladin with shield in defensive stance gets by a mob that don't miss at all with all 7!! attacks? And imaging 2-3 of them. - the whole crusade thing feels overpacked. But overall it's a tremendous game. Worth the money and more.

Trouvez-vous ce commentaire utile ?

Posted on: September 22, 2021

letefte

Possesseur vérifié

Jeux: 658 Avis: 4

It's bigger, it's better, it's badder

If the first game was Baldur’s Gate, this one is Baldur’s Gate 2 with all good and bad this brings. The characters are more interesting right of the bat and are more fleshed out from the get go. The main story is simpler than Kingmaker’s was but has some intriguing implications especially for certain mythic paths. Speaking of the mythic paths, they all get to shine and make your character much more unique than they were in Kingmaker. Some of them change how the entire story unfolds and even how the gameplay works out. The main antagonist is good, with an interesting motivation and a very big plan. That being said, Jon Irenicus she is not. The game has possibly the longest campaign out of any rpg and yet it is very well paced. The breathtaking number of choices in builds is still here, as expected from Pathfinder 1st Edition. The visuals are about the same on the technical side but depict much more interesting locations. The soundtrack is a strong candidate for the title of best OST in any rpg. So far so good right? Well… Although WOTR is not the dumpster fire that Kingmaker was at release, the bugs are still present. Thankfully they start to really crop up after dozens of hours and Owlcat are working around the clock to fix the major ones. The Alfred Pennyworth school of monologue is still giving degrees in blabbermouthology so npcs will spout paragraph upon paragraph of uninteresting details almost every time you ask them a simple question. It’s not as bad as Kingmaker but it’s still annoying. The Crusade/Kingdom Management is a prime example of the old saying: One step forward, two steps back. It doesn’t make you waste take supporting your advisors (who you don’t get to pick) but it is also much more detached from the main story. So, is it worth it? Yes it is, but only if are into this sort of experience. The final rating is 4/5 because of the bugs and the writing style. If it was bug free it would probably be a 5/5 with an asterisk.

Trouvez-vous ce commentaire utile ?

...

Découvrez les jeux de CD PROJEKT RED

Ne manquez pas

Featured

Proche, mais pas une correspondance exacte

Pathfinder: Wrath of the Righteous - Enhanced Edition

L'histoire

JOUEZ VOTRE HÉROS À VOTRE FAÇON

TOUS LES CHOIX ONT DES CONSÉQUENCES

UNE NOUVELLE FAÇON DE COMBATTRE

CONSTITUEZ VOTRE GROUPE

MENEZ LA CROISADE

CONSTITUEZ VOTRE VOIE

Autres notes

Ajouter un avis

Modifier un avis

Supprimer cet avis ?

Signaler cet avis

Informations complémentaires (obligatoire) :

Signaler cet avis