Posted on: January 19, 2021

Hazel Hegemon
Possesseur vérifiéJeux: 307 Avis: 3
Cut content everywhere
Even excusing the hilarious state of the game from a technical standpoint with all the bugs and what not (which I do believe will get fixed), this game is so far from what was promised to us. It's not even an RPG. It's a linear action adventure game with a few critical choices in a (fairly solid, admittedly) 15-20 hour storyline (albeit with double that content in side story missions which are good), set in an fake open world. Why fake? Well, it's an open world for sure, but it's hollow. Nothing to do in it. No pedestrian AI, no AI for drivers, no working police AI. Basically, it's the most expensive walking simulator with little to no interactivity with the surrounding world. This just screams cut content, so much of it. Oh, and perhaps most importantly, the gameplay is really mediocre. Sure, you have plenty of fun weapons to use, but enemy AI is worse than in a 2001 game, the character development system is basically just nonsensical percentage boosts for basic stats, and even those basis stats don't make much sense. It all feels just cobbled together, poorly. On a positive note, the story and quests are fine, characters are good, the game is beautiful (really stunning) and there's excellent music. There's a great game buried somewhere in this mediocre mess of cut content and poor design decisions. Not a great RPG for sure, but a great action adventure game, hence my 3/5. With technical stability, I might bump it to a potential 3.5/5, but no more than that. Not with so many broken promises and missing stuff in this shell of a masterpiece that wasn't to be. CDPR could potentially fixit, if they give it a "No Man's Sky treatment" everybody seems to be aching for. I personally doubt that will happen, but yes, it could save this one, and CDPR's reputation which is gone. Otherwise it will remain a testament to corporate greed, poor decision-making and blatant lies to loyal fans. Oh the irony... Silverhand would rail against you, CDPR, and so should we.
Trouvez-vous ce commentaire utile ?