pops117: Pretty impressive actually if your typed that with your head.
567zu8ip ßu}7uj <- the best I manage to do :/
GOG did well when getting you on board :D
My prehensile eyebrows were of particular interest to the interviewing team. ;)
TheJoe: I think we run into more etymological difficulties by using Gogger. There's a G in there that simply comes from nowhere, creating an inconsistency between the title of the site and the title of its members.
It's simply because GOG is an acronym/abbreviation rather than a proper noun, so it makes more sense to simply add the "er" inflection
after the noun. Much like "AFKer" or "FOFOer" (an acronym we use in out-of-classroom assignments in college).
Essentially, Gogers GOG, where GOG becomes a verb.
(As a further aside, this isn't really etymology, it's more morphology)
It really is more morphology than etymology, yes. I guess my question is, given how English treats a glottal stop after an open vowel, wouldn't Goger tend to be pronounced like "Kroger" or "doge"--that is, with a soft "g"--rather than with the hard glottal stop that we'd assume is customary, from GOG?
I guess it comes down to: has GOG gone far enough on its way to world domination that we can assume that GOG no longer stands for anything as an acronym, but is merely a monolithic presence? Is it, like a laser, an acronym whose acronymity has transcended into a unique word of its own, or do we treat it, still, as a linguistic shorthand?
...I suspect I'm putting way too much thought into this.