Soldiers: Heroes of World War II

the game gives a message texure of surface is too big (esurface,cpp 129) my computer is a w7 intelcore i5-6400 cpu@2,70ghz 8,0Ram nvidia geforce gtx 1050 sambody nows dont anderstand it Jaapius1

I've not even been playing it an hour and I've noticed that:- The Churchill MkIV has ZERO hull armour ratings on all sides, they forgot to even enter them. It's turret armour is more akin to the later Mk VII and VIII models as rather than the MkIV. The Matilda II is armed with a 6-pounder. No Matilda's had those, they only had 2-pounders, and MkIs only had MGs! The Matilda armour is also far too weak..... they got the front about right, but side and rear armour are way of the mark! The "Mines and Explosives" training mission was NOT finishable. Due to having TWO campfires to light, each requiring a can of fuel each..... the idiot mission designer only supplied ONE! The American and British sides ARE IDENTICAL..... using the same set of mixed UK and US built vehicles!!!!! How LAZY is that? Jesus Christ Almighty..... this bug stuffed turkey is the ancestor of the vastly superior Faces of War and Men of War? Well, we are lucky this turd didn't kill those off before they were even born! I think that one hour is enough.....

Although this is my first time playing Soldiers im not very impressed. The biggest aggravation i have is with the controls. Mouse click interface is terrible when selecting infanty and getting them to position as needed. Also the some of the commands you can give your units like "fire at will" are pretty much useless unless the enemy is firing directly on them. Overall the lack of unit control just makes this game more frustrating than fun.

I was expecting an RTS Table-Top like Wargame from this game, what I got was an almost unplayable RTS Wargame with RTS Stealth Strategy audio that eventually turned into an RTS Stealth Strategy game without view cones.

the review title tells the whole story