Ultima™ Underworld 1+2

Ugly, uncontrollable (meaning the controls are shit), unplayable. Pretty immersive simulation of being immersed in a septic tank, however.

I fight against the controls instead of the enemies. I remember how jealous Amiga-owners were back in the 90's because of this ms-dos only game. We had to wait for a few years until the decent "Ambermoon" - first rpg on our machine with that graphics. But it switched to a turn-based game during battles (wise). Do not waste your time with that one unless for nostalgic reasons.

I seriously by no means can understand why this was such a huge success back when it came out. The graphics were called "revolutionary", but compared to the "step by step" 90 degrees pseudo-3D RPGs like Eye of the Beholder this looks atrocious. Smoothly scrolling 3D games have aged very badly. Combine this with the horrible sound (best turned off entirely) with very clunky and bad controls. Thanks, but no thanks, I'm sticking with the Beholder Trilogy!!!

Oh,manhowmuchtimedidIgiveovertothesetwogames?SomeofmyfavoritegamingmemoriesarefromtheUltimaseries.TheonlythingthattoppedtheUnderworldsgameswasSystemShock.Hopefully,onedaythatgamecanbebroughtback,aswell.

This is an ancient first-person RPG that predates even Betrayal at Krondor by a year. Utterly obnoxious to play in every way by modern standards. Also by ~1996 standards (see: Strife). Honestly, even just the simple fact that S doesn't make you reverse is enough to drive me insane (you have to either turn around or click using the right function). Ancient video games are a lot harder to get into than ancient movies. Watching Nosferatu or Battleship Potemkin doesn't take much effort, and they're still enjoyable. Ancient video games like this require a ton of effort and unless you're really really really into this i wouldn't recommend it.