Dieses Spiel enthält nicht jugendfreie Inhalte, die nur für die Altersgruppe 17+ geeignet sind
Indem du unten auf "Weiter" klickst, bestätigst du, dass du 17 Jahre oder älter bist.
Zurück zu den Angeboten© 2005 Activision Publishing, Inc. Activision is a registered trademark and GUN is a trademark of Activision Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. All other trademarks and trade names are the properties of their respective owners.
Berechnung der Spiellänge durch HowLongToBeat
Posted on: July 16, 2021
shovas
Spiele: 746 Rezensionen: 5
Great for its time, not so much anymore
This was absolutely great in its time and it got me into westerns. It's worth a play-through if you haven't played it but after that the world becomes incredibly tiny, especially if you've already played Red Dead Redemption 1/2. Just go for Red Dead Redemption 1 or 2 if you're not sure.
Hilft dir das weiter?
Posted on: April 14, 2018
chlop
Bestätigter BesitzerSpiele: 2575 Rezensionen: 106
Too easy
Playing this game on normal difficulty, I felt like I was playing on baby mode. A lot of missions take no longer than a minute to complete, and if you somehow fail at them, you can instantly restart them & try again. Missions are also far and few between as far as variety goes - there are only about three missions overall - kill a bad guy, defend a good guy, and the occasional mission where you get to do something halfway interesting. Gun, as its name might suggest, is a GTA clone set in the old west. And having seen quite a few GTA clones up to now, Gun seems to be the best copy so far. Not that it says much. Although you can engage in hunting, gold digging & poker playing, they're all easy and don't offer much of a distraction from the main game. You can try to roam the map, but it's rather small & uninteresting. As far as plot goes, it doesn't really matter. Not to say it doesn't exist - the game tries to be as cinematic as it possibly can, with its limited graphics, but I was never made to care for the bland main character. And with cutscenes taking longer than the actual missions, I oftentimes skipped them. You don't need them to know what to do. Sadly, for a GTA clone, Gun is incredibly rigid. Meaning you either complete a mission how it wants you to do it, or you'll struggle to complete it. In many missions you'll have your hand held, with you having someone to follow, or you having to reach certain checkpoints. It doesn't help that the first series of missions are tutorial missions you don't really need nor want. My only other major gripe is with expectations vs reality. Having a game set in the old west I expected a gritty realistic take on an iconic era. Instead I got Gunsmoke and Bonanza, with dubbing that was either stereotypical or out of place. I did get some enjoyment out of shooting 3 baddies in a row while riding my horse, hearing atmospheric music in the background, but I wanted more. Also, I'd prefer less glitches, stuttering & crashing.
Hilft dir das weiter?
Posted on: January 29, 2023
PatchRowcester
Spiele: 236 Rezensionen: 7
Set back by bad boss battles
The story is set in late 19th century America, specifically in the Old West, and involves finding the lost city of Quivira, where this is lot of gold to be mined. Its somewhat of an open world game, and the player gets to backtrack between cities. There are quite a few side missions as well, and completing these missions reward the player with cash, which can be used to buy weapons and upgrades. The game has a thoroughly budget feel to it. It is a poor man's Red Dead Redemption. The save system is confusing. It appears that you can save the game at any point, but when you load the game (and you have to quit the current game to do so), it begins at the start of the mission. There is no auto checkpoint system to go along with the manual save system. There were times when I forgot to manually save the game, and I lost progress. Very annoying. I would much rather have a manual save system, and a quick save system, but modern games have taught me to expect a checkpoint system, which I loathe. Visually, the game looks alright. There is no support for widescreen resolutions. I played the game at 1600x1200. I have a computer that is dedicated to playing older games, and on a 1080p monitor, the game is very playable. I would not play this game on my ultrawide monitor because it would not scale very well, and it would end up looking awful. By far the worst aspect of this game are the boss battles. They are horrible. It feels as if the enemies cheat, and have wall hacks the way can shoot you when you peak from behind the cover for a second. This gets really annoying towards the end. I had to find a way to cheese my way through because it was damn near impossible to play fair and square. Its possible that the reason I had this problem because I did not play any of the side missions, however, that means there is a problem with scaling the difficulty of the boss battles. - Bad boss battles - General budget feel of the game - Weird save system Verdict - Worth about $2.
Hilft dir das weiter?
Posted on: June 23, 2016
syscrusher
Spiele: 88 Rezensionen: 42
More after GUN
It would be nice if this means GOG will release CALL OF JUAREZ soon!
Hilft dir das weiter?
Posted on: July 8, 2019
Thecassius
Bestätigter BesitzerSpiele: 245 Rezensionen: 5
Meh
I wanted to check this game out because it was made by Neversoft, the developers of the renowned Tony Hawks series, however, after playing it i would say if you're not an absolute super-duper mega thps-fan you should go play something else. Unfortunately bad difficulty balancing and a racist portrayal of indigenous cultures make this a bad time on top of the forgettable main story.
Hilft dir das weiter?
Ein Fehler ist aufgetreten. Bitte aktualisiere die Seite.
Keine Bewertungen mit deinen Einstellungen vorhanden
Error loading patrons. Please refresh the page and try again.
