It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
low rated
I have played up to the assault of the castle and I am very disappointed in the way it seems to have been console only then ported to PC IMO which it doesn't handle well. They changed the way it plays most likely for consoles as consoles don't use mouse keyboard. The mouse keyboard sucks and am not buying a damn controller to play a PC game.

The Graphics look console-ish the game play is console-ish So far The Witcher 2 sucks compared to The Witcher 1. It will not play as well and many options are gone that The Witcher 1 had. This is a rush job full of bugs and just a plain mess not worthy of being called the witcher 2 did the same people make this that made the 1st one?

Where are the different views to play from? Like The Witcher had...
Why did they port this game from console to PC? Ruined a whole game because of damn console's...

It is sluggish and slow compared to The Witcher.

My advise is wait on buying it until you have read that all the bugs have been fixed. They have added to the game the options of different views to battle from, and make game play fun because right now it sucks in all areas except the movies which are nice. If they make the options they had in the 1st Witcher available for this one then maybe it might be playable.

I give it 1 STAR right now it is awful... They changed it so much you wont know what the hell you are to do and it sure Don't give you much on figuring it out...

Lets hope they fix this game its in bad shape as is.
I give him for his troll post a half star
lol so this troll played only 10 min and he thinks his qualified to give a solid opinion lol
How did they port it from console to PC if there's no console version ? Some elements seem to to have been designed with a PC to Console port somewhere down the road in mind, yes, but that's definitely not the same

The graphics look amazing. The level of detail blows me away and any of the artists who worked on this game, well, i'll have their babies if any of them want me to.

This is most definitely not a rush job, saying so only makes you look silly.
Post edited May 19, 2011 by Namur
You're either a troll or a complete dribbling retard. Either way you are wasting oxygen. Please die in a fire.
the controls have all changed it, and the game play as well that is most disappointing. The Game is sluggish cant stand what they did o it myself and as I said IMO so you have your opinion I have mine.
avatar
FlyByU: the controls have all changed it, and the game play as well that is most disappointing. The Game is sluggish cant stand what they did o it myself and as I said IMO so you have your opinion I have mine.
What do you mean by 'the game is sluggish'? Are you talking about actual game performance or the way the story unfolds?

As for the graphics: how do you figure they look consolish?

I'm not calling you a troll, I'm genuinely interested in how you came to your conclusions about the game, since you didn't really flesh out your opinions.
It looks like a console game? Really? Where are the other console games that look this good because clearly I am missing out.
Dear Friends

Please, to give opinion on something like book, please read it first to the end.
I may say, that you are morron, because I have read only 2 posts of yours.
...but when I will know you better, I may tell you are not a morron.
Best regards.

Sincerely
avatar
FlyByU: the controls have all changed it, and the game play as well that is most disappointing. The Game is sluggish cant stand what they did o it myself and as I said IMO so you have your opinion I have mine.
FACT: The game is not a console port.

FACT: The game is not a rush job by any standarts considering its dev cycle.

IMO covers subjectivity not objective facts.
The graphics look console-ish? Can you give some insight into why you think this? Because honestly, this is one of the dumbest things I've read all day.
OK go read this thread nicer way of saying what I did.

http://www.gog.com/en/forum/the_witcher_2/features_i_hoped_are_patched_in/page1

It is a rush job they left out a lot of stuff that the first one had so IMO it is a rush job and IMO a console port it plays and looks and acts like one.
avatar
Namur: FACT: The game is not a console port.
Well the game is not a console port, and I disagree with most of the points of the OP (No idea what he means with "console-graphics"), but I am forced to admit that a lot of things in the game do look like a console port, the interfaces (inventory, skill screen,etc...), the ultra-limited in-game settings, etc... that's actually the first thing I noticed and they surprised me when I started the game.
avatar
_Motoki_: It looks like a console game? Really? Where are the other console games that look this good because clearly I am missing out.
Cod4 and on are all console ports and handle sluggish like one as well there are many other console ports that are the same way.
Yet, you never actually give examples to support yiour opinion.

This is a fail troll.