Posted June 17, 2010
I made my first GOG purchase last night: this game and three others. I've installed all four, and while the other three gave me no problems, Septerra Core installs with the .exe clicked for Compatability Mode with Windows XP SP2, to disable visual themes, and to run as administrator. This causes the shortcut icon on desktop to have one of those stupid Vista UAC shield icons over it. And then it requires me to go through a UAC warning and Allow the program to run.
The other three games (Arcanum, Port Royale, and Vampire: the Masquerade - Redemption) did not do this. They start up fine, no UAC annoyances.
When I uncheck the "Run as Administrator" selection, that's when Septerra Core starts up without the UAC annoyance, but that stupid shield icon overlaying the shortcut icon never goes away. Yes, it bothers me.
Does anyone know why Septerra Core installs wonky like that? Any solutions or ideas? I'm running Vista 32-bit Home, and I do have my own user account set as the administrator. Or however that should be said so it makes proper sense.
(Also, an added but unrelated question: I read a post on the Arcanum forum where someone was recommending to install the games outside the Program Files folder. Why is this, one, and is there any merit to that suggestion?)
Thanks!
The other three games (Arcanum, Port Royale, and Vampire: the Masquerade - Redemption) did not do this. They start up fine, no UAC annoyances.
When I uncheck the "Run as Administrator" selection, that's when Septerra Core starts up without the UAC annoyance, but that stupid shield icon overlaying the shortcut icon never goes away. Yes, it bothers me.
Does anyone know why Septerra Core installs wonky like that? Any solutions or ideas? I'm running Vista 32-bit Home, and I do have my own user account set as the administrator. Or however that should be said so it makes proper sense.
(Also, an added but unrelated question: I read a post on the Arcanum forum where someone was recommending to install the games outside the Program Files folder. Why is this, one, and is there any merit to that suggestion?)
Thanks!