Tormentfan: Forget it. Should have read the forum properly, I see Timeslip is at it again.
Why is his rep only 98 considering that people who post reams of rubbish are in the high hundreds?.. Something is definitely wrong with the rep system on this site.
JudasIscariot: His rep may be that low due to the fact that Timeslip may not post as often :D.
Then would it not be better and more advantageous to have a reputation system actually built on reputation instead of quantity over quality? because in such a case, isn't calling it 'rep' rather misleading.. if you keep the current system would a rename not be in order.. to something like "Time waster quotient"?
Anyway thx for the reply..
And Timeslip.. keep up the good work. ;)