The pc version's video files for Rayman Origins are of a lower quality than it's console brethren, which can be fixed. Keep in mind that these are much larger files, but it sure makes up for it in quality. Nothing too special here, just another deal of overwriting the old video files with the new.

The console video files can be found here:
http://community.pcgamingwiki.com/files/file/697-rayman-origins-ps3-videos/

Removed due to incorrect info

No, it isn't 1.02. You cannot use the d-pad diagonals with the GOG version, which was fixed with the patched exe.

Goodluck with getting Ubisoft to issue the patches here. Remember that they don't even have the patches available on Uplay for some reason. If they don't issue the patches, at least there is a workable fix for the GOG version currently.

I have the retail copy with patches. So if gog is willing to accept a "community" patch as an official download then that's doable. My only concern is if I'm having to unofficially patch my digital copy, then why wouldn't I just use the retail copy and just make a Dropbox digital copy of that.

i've been at gog and ubisofts for literally months. this is how i understand the situation. ubisoft possibly made the mistake of providing outdated builds to gog. this is where it becomes complicated

however, it is not for ubisoft to update it. even though devs on other game releases do update their games, they ask gog to request it.

gog on the other hand won't acknowledge this as an issue, they won't ask ubisoft for the patch. but they do seem to agree that patching requests has to go through them

neither party is helpful.

as i understand it, the retail disc is drm-free and automatically patches it fairly painlessly. so if gog had version 1.00, i don't see why they would struggle to get the patch even though it literally doesn't ask for a cd key or any other form of drm.

thank you soooooooo much

Nice. Hopefully as GOG grows publishers & developers will stop abandoning their games on GOG without the latest updates.

I wonder if this was GOG, or if Ubisoft suddenly remembered GOG exists. If it's the latter does that mean we might be getting more Ubisoft games in the near future?

Edit: Though PCGamingWiki said that the Uplay version of this game wasn't patched either, so maybe it doesn't really mean anything other then Ubisoft finally got around to updating this game :/.