Posted March 28, 2017
Stig79: 1. No it was not problematic at all. The game didn't let you import a world-state so the game offers a canon ending that BG2 uses. Viconia tells you she spent her time living on a farm near Beregost. She eventually killed the farmers and fled to Amn. Given that SoD ends a few weeks before BG2 starts....
2. No his reasons are crystal clear. You find his journal in BG2. He has been planning to steal YOUR soul for years.Trying to get you executed just ends up being completely moronic. Given that it is the main plot of BG2, this is a gigantic plot-hole.
3. Yes they are different. The lead writer even said so herself that she wanted to give them new personalities. Safana was nothing but a sex-object, and Jaheira was nothing but a "nagging wife". This, according to her, made them "poor representations of women".
Here is the exact quote from her “If there was something for the original Baldur’s Gate that just doesn’t mesh for modern day gamers like the sexism, [we tried to address that],” said writer Amber Scott. “In the original there’s a lot of jokes at women’s expense. Or if not a lot, there’s a couple, like Safana was just a sex object in BG 1, and Jaheira was the nagging wife and that was played for comedy. We were able to say like, ‘No, that’s not really the kind of story we want to make.’ In Siege of Dragonspear, Safana gets her own little storyline, she got a way better personality upgrade. If people don’t like that, then too bad.”
Basically she sees it as her duty to "fix" the sexism in the original game. Keeping the expansion in tune with the rest of the games doesn't even factor in. That is how you mess up a story.
4. No. Irenicus is doing it in SoD. Because the writer thought it was he who did it in BG2 as well. This is what happens when you let a social activist get full freedom of writing the middle chapter in a much loved franchise with complex characters.
1. As I said, it's a valid criticism, I'm not defending their continuity errors. 2. No his reasons are crystal clear. You find his journal in BG2. He has been planning to steal YOUR soul for years.Trying to get you executed just ends up being completely moronic. Given that it is the main plot of BG2, this is a gigantic plot-hole.
3. Yes they are different. The lead writer even said so herself that she wanted to give them new personalities. Safana was nothing but a sex-object, and Jaheira was nothing but a "nagging wife". This, according to her, made them "poor representations of women".
Here is the exact quote from her “If there was something for the original Baldur’s Gate that just doesn’t mesh for modern day gamers like the sexism, [we tried to address that],” said writer Amber Scott. “In the original there’s a lot of jokes at women’s expense. Or if not a lot, there’s a couple, like Safana was just a sex object in BG 1, and Jaheira was the nagging wife and that was played for comedy. We were able to say like, ‘No, that’s not really the kind of story we want to make.’ In Siege of Dragonspear, Safana gets her own little storyline, she got a way better personality upgrade. If people don’t like that, then too bad.”
Basically she sees it as her duty to "fix" the sexism in the original game. Keeping the expansion in tune with the rest of the games doesn't even factor in. That is how you mess up a story.
4. No. Irenicus is doing it in SoD. Because the writer thought it was he who did it in BG2 as well. This is what happens when you let a social activist get full freedom of writing the middle chapter in a much loved franchise with complex characters.
2. I'm sorry but there's nothing on his diaries about planing to steal your soul for years. Look for yourself, here's the full text:
http://baldursgate.wikia.com/wiki/First_Journal_of_Jon_Irenicus
http://baldursgate.wikia.com/wiki/Second_Journal_of_Jon_Irenicus
I watched a YouTube video to refresh my memory on the ending of SoD, when Irenicus frames you he says nothing about you going to be executed, so that's not what he wants. He appears again when you are in jail and he say these final words before leaving: "You will escape this place. We will meet again. Fear the meeting, child of Bhaal. We have so far to go together". Those are not the words of someone who wanted you executed. This is not a plot-hole. You just underestimated Irenicus plan all along, same way as Charname did. :) The way I see it, he just didn't want you to remain as the Hero of Baldur's Gate, so he framed you to make people hate you, so you wouldn't be missed when he captured you.
3. Well, I can only speak from my experience; Jaheira didn't act out of character as far as I'm concerned and I didn't play with Safana so I don't know about her changes. If others think Safana is acting out of character, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt. And if they say Jaheira is acting out of character, well, I didn't notice it. Was it because Khalid wasn't in my party? Was it because I didn't get some banter others did? I don't know. I can only say I didn't notice anything wrong with her.
4. If the writer indeed made that mistake, well, then that's a significant plot-hole. Is this something the writer or anyone in the knows said (meaning, can you provide a quote?) or just your opinion?
As for the social activist thing, that's a ridiculous thing to say, it's irrelevant to the argument and makes me suspicious of your reasons for your criticism of SoD.