It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Alonia for ever!

Challenge of the Five Realms, a MicroProse 1992 classic RPG in a land of high-fantasy full of magic and wonder, is available for Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux on GOG.com, for only $5.99.

In Challenge of the Five Realms you now have 100 days to keep the world from being cast into eternal despair! But is 100 days enough? After all, in addition to confronting Grimnoth’s evil forces, you’ll have to unlock the many mysteries behind his power. And you’ll need to overcome the myriad obstacles that dot each realm! Defeat a menacing band of traitors intent on conquering your kingdom; journey beneath the ocean to a vast underwater land; venture into the core of the world to find hidden secrets, fly to the majestic kingdom of the sky and experience the magic and wonder of the enchanted forest. You’ll experience an array of wondrous and unpredictable scenarios. Each brought to life by compelling animations, streamlined character generation, and a truly unique storyline!

If you're looking for an involving tale of heroism and magic, the world of classic role-playing games is probably the best place to start looking, and with Challenge of the Five Realms for only $5.99 on GOG.com, your quest is guaranteed to be successful!
avatar
Schnuff: Sorry, but a classic is not only an old game. At the time of its release it was already outdated. To be sure i checked the reviews again....mediocre. ah, well lets see what the other sites can offer.
I agree that being old is not, itself, enough to make a game--and, thus,a release--good, and I'm kind of sad that this poster got downvoted for expressing their opinion. The GOG forums, oh so wonderful and civil until someone doesn't like the wrong game.

(I, personally, do not care one way or the other about this game.)
Post edited September 18, 2014 by BadDecissions
avatar
Schnuff: Sorry, but a classic is not only an old game. At the time of its release it was already outdated. To be sure i checked the reviews again....mediocre. ah, well lets see what the other sites can offer.
avatar
BadDecissions: I agree that being old is not, itself, enough to make a game--and, thus,a release--good, and I'm kind of sad that this poster got downvoted for expressing their opinion. The GOG forums, oh so wonderful and civil until someone doesn't like the wrong game.
Agreed. An opinion is just an opinion, and it's disappointing that people would downvote our Pinkypotamus just for stating one. Personally I plan to try the game and form my own, but unless someone is writing posts like "lolol, nice game for hitlerfags!" then I don't think they need to be censured*.

* not a spelling error, censorship is a whole different level of response
This looks like an interesting game, wishlisted for now.
Even though I've never heard of it, this is exactly the type of game I'm thrilled to see land on GOG. Microprose is to be trusted, and this game certainly looks interesting and fun... even though time limits make my skin crawl!

I'll probably pick this up during a sale sometime.
As was said earlier, it looks very much like Times of Lore.

It also reminded me that I'm still waiting for the release of madman, which may be a better fit for those who don't like time limits. I tried to contact Dr Dungeon, the game's creator, but no luck so far.

The original topic about it is here

http://www.gog.com/forum/general/madman_an_ultimalike_rpg_coming_soon

and the official site

http://www.machgryphon.com/index.html
avatar
gandalfnho: Looks interesting. How the time limit work? Is like Fallout where you have decent spare time to be able to explore all towns and do all quests or this game doesn't have space to mistakes?
There is a darkness coming from the south, so it is possible for certain critical locations (in the south) to become inaccessible even before the time limit.

That said, I don't remember the game being cryptic. If you pay attention, maybe even take notes, you will probably know which locations to go first. It's been 20 years since I last played so your results may vary. Time limit is less forgiving than Fallout, but even as a 8 or 9 year old, although I had some problems, it's nothing even a little me couldn't figure out.

C5 was the game that got me into CRPGs. Literally the first CRPG i ever played. When I saw screenshots for Baldur's Gate for the first time, it interested me right away. The GUI has similarity: top down view, point and click, row of portraits. And like C5, Baldur's has you creating a single character and other party members join.

C5 is more tactical perhaps though. You will eventually have ~30 or more people in your party. Like, BG, some strong personalities too. And also some faceless squads of soldiers who have no name. Basically a mini army. Some battles will be very epic.

I don't want to say too much, because people's money is at stake, and also I can't say much in the first place. I haven't play in almost 20 years after all, keep that in mind. But I would probably give it 4/5. Probably. A flawed game but ambitious too. This isn't some lazily developed RPG that's for sure. Despite it's mistakes it was a game developed with love and caring. These are the same guys who made Bloodnet after all... I haven't played that but it looks like the same engine and everything. If you've played Bloodnet, maybe you will have some idea what to expect, for better or worse.
avatar
JMich: Finally. You know how tempting it was to post here? It does remind me quite a bit of Ultima VII, now to go looking for more info.
except ultima 7 is good and this is...not good.

just an advance warning :P
avatar
BreOl72: And another game, I never heard of.
However, this looks absolutely like my kind of game, except this:
avatar
Crosmando: [...] it has a time limit [...]
avatar
BreOl72: Aargh,...
Usually, I avoid games with a time limit - I want to play in my own pace.

So, how is the limit set? Can the game be beaten, if I wander around and look everywhere, or do you have to follow a walkthrough, so you don't do a step or two too much, which will cost you the victory in the end - with the finishing line already in sight?

Added to my cart - now, to buy or not to buy, that is the question...
...what would you say?
c5r lasts "100 days" [if i'm remembering rightly] - basically, the way it works is a darkness is creeping over the land. everywhere the darkness happens, you can't go. [i'm remembering this, now, which means i might be misremembering] - this makes it impossible to complete some parts of the game if you're not "fast enough."

it's not a game where you can dawdle, really.

it has...other problems, but that's probably the biggest one.
Post edited September 18, 2014 by lostwolfe
high rated
avatar
BadDecissions: I agree that being old is not, itself, enough to make a game--and, thus,a release--good, and I'm kind of sad that this poster got downvoted for expressing their opinion. The GOG forums, oh so wonderful and civil until someone doesn't like the wrong game.
avatar
IAmSinistar: Agreed. An opinion is just an opinion, and it's disappointing that people would downvote our Pinkypotamus just for stating one. Personally I plan to try the game and form my own, but unless someone is writing posts like "lolol, nice game for hitlerfags!" then I don't think they need to be censured*.
Perhaps the problem is that you assume people downvote with an "intent to censure". I suspect far more people downvote with an "intent to disagree", just as an upvote might mean "helpful post that should be promoted" but can also just mean "me too". Without a locked instructional banner at the top of a forum, it's probably impossible to separate mild social response from genuine attempts at community moderation.

It's not as if this thread is filled with a vehement fanbase for the game. It's more interested but cautious people seeking information. Perhaps Schnuff's opinion was low rated because it was so dismissive? Or maybe because it was based on rather silly criteria? It hardly matters if a game seemed outdated on release, when to the current audience it's guaranteed to be more than a decade outdated. And contemporaneous reviews are awful at judging a game's long-term appeal. Among other problems, they're too influenced by genre gluts of the time. Many now well thought of CRPGs were considered only serviceable, or even substandard, when released alongside a constant stream of similar games.

Anyway, no need to think there's a lynch mob out for the hippo.
avatar
JMich: Finally. You know how tempting it was to post here? It does remind me quite a bit of Ultima VII, now to go looking for more info.
avatar
lostwolfe: except ultima 7 is good and this is...not good.

just an advance warning :P
No worries either way :)
It was mostly this image that made me think of Ultima, corpses and candles. Even if the images are quite different.
Always when I read Micropose i just go "Please be Birth of the Federation, please be Birth of the Federation, please be Birth of the Federation" ^^

But that looks quite interesting I might buy it later.
Post edited September 18, 2014 by Wincerind
avatar
zlep: Perhaps the problem is that you assume people downvote with an "intent to censure". I suspect far more people downvote with an "intent to disagree", just as an upvote might mean "helpful post that should be promoted" but can also just mean "me too". Without a locked instructional banner at the top of a forum, it's probably impossible to separate mild social response from genuine attempts at community moderation.
Actually, the problem in this instance is people telling me what I assume. Great way to piss me off immediately, with that combination of arrogance and superiority. Believe it or not, I've actually been on this forum (and forums in general) long enough to understand the complexities and nuances involved in individual reactions. But hey, feel free to reduce me to a few select words. I won't even downrep you for it.

The rest of your point is valid, regardless. It's just unfortunate that my attempt to post a message about greater civility had to provoke this kind of reply.

avatar
zlep: Anyway, no need to think there's a lynch mob out for the hippo.
Didn't say there was. But if reading that into my post helps you make whatever your point is, I suppose it's justified.
avatar
lostwolfe: [snip]
Thank you for your thoughts.
Much appreciated.
I think, I'll wait with a purchase.
avatar
zlep: With only 100 days to save the world, I might need anxiety counselling after this one... (Seriously, 100 days? Google tells me my characters can advance from Level 1 to 100 over the game. How? Is "The Fool's Guide To Leveling Up in Just 24 Hours" a bestseller in this kingdom???)
I'm pretty sure that was a reference to the skills, which are generally 0 to 100 (but sometimes over 100) and the skills improve the more they are used, and that's the only way to improve them I think. I don't remember there being any actual character levels in this game, and the screenshots seems to support my memory. So I'm pretty sure it's just skills and attributes, no character levels. So basically, the exact opposite of what you said.
avatar
zlep: Perhaps the problem is that you assume people downvote with an "intent to censure". I suspect far more people downvote with an "intent to disagree", just as an upvote might mean "helpful post that should be promoted" but can also just mean "me too". Without a locked instructional banner at the top of a forum, it's probably impossible to separate mild social response from genuine attempts at community moderation.
avatar
IAmSinistar: Actually, the problem in this instance is people telling me what I assume. Great way to piss me off immediately, with that combination of arrogance and superiority. Believe it or not, I've actually been on this forum (and forums in general) long enough to understand the complexities and nuances involved in individual reactions. But hey, feel free to reduce me to a few select words. I won't even downrep you for it.

The rest of your point is valid, regardless. It's just unfortunate that my attempt to post a message about greater civility had to provoke this kind of reply.
Dont you think your being a little harsh? He just got the definition of censured and censored mixed up. It was a mistake.

Going back on topic I can find so little info on this game Im tempted to buy it. Im intrigued as shit.
avatar
Beelzebubb: Dont you think your being a little harsh? He just got the definition of censured and censored mixed up. It was a mistake.
Perhaps. I'm not good with my anger, unfortunately, as much as I try to moderate it and be a reasonable person. Some things just set me off. Sorry to the board for that.

Also returning to topic, I picked up the game myself. It's uncommon for me to run across a game like this that I've never heard of before. It'll probably be a while before I can render an opinion on it though, as I've already got a few too many games going at once right now.