It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
It is being reported that even though the makers of Serena, the same people behind the masterpiece called "Scratches: Director's Cut" (which was being sold here until some time ago, too), tried to convince GOG to release Serena here for FREE, ***GOG REFUSED***! Why is that? This item is on the community wishlist, too! Also, what exactly is the policy of GOG "Against free games being distributed here, with only a few certain exceptions"? Why should steam monopolize "Free to Play games", exactly, come again?!??!!?
Post edited March 29, 2016 by KiNgBrAdLeY7
This question / problem has been solved by RWarehallimage
avatar
KiNgBrAdLeY7: Why should steam monopolize "Free to Play games", exactly, come again?!??!!?
It shoudn't, and it doesn't. If the devs want their game available somewhere else so badly, they can always put it on itch.io, where there's no evil curation system going on...
avatar
KiNgBrAdLeY7: snip
The only correct answer is that "it's too niche". ;)
avatar
KiNgBrAdLeY7: Why should steam monopolize "Free to Play games", exactly, come again?!??!!?
avatar
muntdefems: It shoudn't, and it doesn't. If the devs want their game available somewhere else so badly, they can always put it on itch.io, where there's no evil curation system going on...
No. ***GOG REFUSED***. Hence the question. Did you even read that which i wrote just above...?
Post edited March 29, 2016 by KiNgBrAdLeY7
avatar
muntdefems:
avatar
KiNgBrAdLeY7: No. Developer reports GOG refused. Hence the question. Did you even read that which i wrote just above...?
Bradley, don't take this the wrong way, but no one ever reads what you write. :D
Post edited March 29, 2016 by tinyE
Serena was a poor excuse for a game anyway. About 30-40 minutes of "gameplay" with a lack lustre twist for the sake of twisting (which was somewhat apparent after certain plot points were revealed). GoG likely didn't want to soil their hands with such...
This has about 40-50 minutes of content... I dont see a reason for it to exist here, its more of a flash game with no controls, saving, or customization. If they need exposure just release a self executable on there site.

It just smells fishy, why not lead with Asylum and give Serena as a bonus D/L?
Post edited March 29, 2016 by Starkrun
Should GoG host anyone who wants to release their game for free? I have a hard time seeing how GoG profits much from that model...
low rated
Because you touch yourself at night.
avatar
KiNgBrAdLeY7: It is being reported that even though the makers of Serena, the same people behind the masterpiece called "Scratches: Director's Cut" (which was being sold here until some time ago, too), tried to convince GOG to release Serena here for FREE, ***GOG REFUSED***! Why is that? This item is on the community wishlist, too! Also, what exactly is the policy of GOG "Against free games being distributed here, with only a few certain exceptions"? Why should steam monopolize "Free to Play games", exactly, come again?!??!!?
If its free, why not just stick a download link on their web page? The problem here is its steam, who is going to want to go through the effort to get it - and I haven't checked it has this mind you - all steam free, ready for GOG, when no-one is going to make any money out of it, not to mention support.
I think declining games with less than 40 votes is an intended feature of a community-curated store. Don't you agree?
avatar
KiNgBrAdLeY7: It is being reported that even though the makers of Serena, the same people behind the masterpiece called "Scratches: Director's Cut" (which was being sold here until some time ago, too), tried to convince GOG to release Serena here for FREE, ***GOG REFUSED***! Why is that? This item is on the community wishlist, too! Also, what exactly is the policy of GOG "Against free games being distributed here, with only a few certain exceptions"? Why should steam monopolize "Free to Play games", exactly, come again?!??!!?
avatar
nightcraw1er.488: If its free, why not just stick a download link on their web page? The problem here is its steam, who is going to want to go through the effort to get it - and I haven't checked it has this mind you - all steam free, ready for GOG, when no-one is going to make any money out of it, not to mention support.
They have a download link, alright.

http://www.indiedb.com/games/serena
avatar
muntdefems: It shoudn't, and it doesn't. If the devs want their game available somewhere else so badly, they can always put it on itch.io, where there's no evil curation system going on...
avatar
KiNgBrAdLeY7: No. ***GOG REFUSED***. Hence the question. Did you even read that which i wrote just above...?
Yeah, I read that. GOG ***allegedly*** refused the game. So? How can that fact imply that Steam monopolizes "Free to play games"? As I said, there are other places where devs can place their free games (and DRM-free!), like itch.io. IndieGameStand also has a free games section.

So if you want that game outside of Steam and cannot have it, it's not entirely GOG's fault. That was my point.
When GOG adds this title to their catalogue, whether free or not, they will have to support it as well.
Probably they did not want to do that. Just a hunch.
Post edited March 29, 2016 by jorlin
avatar
a4plz: I think declining games with less than 40 votes is an intended feature of a community-curated store. Don't you agree?
Yeah, I looked that up when KiNgBrAdLeY7 ***REFUSED*** to mention the vote count.
Post edited March 29, 2016 by Darling_Jimmy