It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Petrell: Are you assuming that or has there been confimation from a Blue?
Considering that the AAA game was not announced here, but on a press conference by CDPR, there won't be any confirmation by blues. At any rate, the question was asked at CDPR and the answer was a negative.
Post edited April 21, 2016 by Grargar
avatar
Wishbone: Given that GOG permits the installation of its games to as many machines as you own, you can implicitly have several people in your household playing the same game at the same time with only a single purchase from GOG. With DRM-free multiplayer, those same people could be playing the game online against each other (legally mind you, given GOG's terms), which would be impossible with DRM'ed multiplayer.
avatar
bruceFish: The criticism is about games which offer multiplayer only through Galaxy. This means that you can not play the multiplayer once you lose your GOG account (or GOG gets bankrupt). And yes, although you can install your games on as many machines as you want, I'm pretty sure that you can't use the Galaxy multiplayer on multiple machines at the same time. That's because games using the Galaxy API don't work with IP addresses but with PlayerIDs. Maybe GOG's intention was not to add DRM to their games, but in fact they did.
I...what? I was explaining to TinyE what DRM-free multiplayer means. I made no mention of Galaxy, or how any specific game implements multiplayer. My post did not adress or relate to any criticism put forth in this thread.
avatar
Petrell: I would bet it's No Man's Sky, considering how much effort GOG has put on it's advertising.
avatar
Grargar: No, it's not. They have ruled out that possibility.
Thank f*** for that. They been pushing the boat on that since it came here, that announcement would have been over the top if it was NMS