It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
I think streaming would make things much worse for the video gaming industry. People like to own discs with nice box art and books. Sure, some people will copy but that will always be the case. Without an intensive to own a natty looking physical product and the impressive ability of pirates to make titles available, I can't see streaming working well for the industry at all.

Who actually asked for streaming anyway? Forum opinion always seems very much opposed to it in general.
avatar
jamyskis: Yeah, computing tech is another perfect example of what I was talking about with market trending more towards splitting than being supplanted. I know the entire IT industry was in a frenzy about how tablets would make the PC obsolete, and it's never come to pass and doesn't look like it ever will.

It's the same prediction that industry pundits made when laptops came about, that the days of the desktop were numbered. The quiet dissenting voices pointing out that laptops could never achieve the performance of desktop were openly mocked and pushed to the side, because it was a rational view that wasn't profitable, wasn't sellable and wasn't newsworthy. And yet, 20 years later, here we are.

That's not to say tablets and laptops don't have a raison d'etre - tablets are superb as consumption devices and for simple games, laptops for creative processes where the user has to move around a lot or only has limited space. These solutions offer benefits but compromise on certain features to achieve these benefits.

So I'm sure streaming will find its niche for in-home solutions, gaming rentals and demoing, but when local gaming is an affordable, technically and legally superior alternative, there's no way it's going to be replaced by streaming just because the industry wants it to.
It's funny because people are still buying gaming laptops and getting upset that they don't perform as well as desktops that are thousands of dollars cheaper (for instance, saw an ASUS gaming laptop for $1300 with a 750m in it. This is weaker than my 5 year old desktop by a long shot, cost about the same). People are constantly buying laptops for gaming and are surprised when they find out it is ill-suited for it. Why? Because laptops are all they've ever known, or they are always on the go and can't use a desktop.
avatar
paladin181: It's funny because people are still buying gaming laptops and getting upset that they don't perform as well as desktops that are thousands of dollars cheaper (for instance, saw an ASUS gaming laptop for $1300 with a 750m in it. This is weaker than my 5 year old desktop by a long shot, cost about the same). People are constantly buying laptops for gaming and are surprised when they find out it is ill-suited for it. Why? Because laptops are all they've ever known, or they are always on the go and can't use a desktop.
Not true, at least for one. I was bootcamp iMac for years, and I was surprised as you describe.

But how about not "victim blaming" - but joining me in demanding ASUS is fit for purpose, any time around?